...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science >There are no qualitative methods – nor quantitative for that matter: the misleading rhetoric of the qualitative–quantitative argument
【24h】

There are no qualitative methods – nor quantitative for that matter: the misleading rhetoric of the qualitative–quantitative argument

机译：没有定性的方法，也没有定量的方法：定性和定量论证的误导性言论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article is about the comprehensive but meaningless rhetoric encircling the pseudo issue of quantitative–qualitative method. Two questions get clarification in this article. First, what does the term method mean, and second, what constraints should be attached to the term when moving into the theory and practice of science. Based on an examination of these two, we subsequently address the question of what the quantitative–qualitative argument is about. Our reasoning leads to the conclusion that the quantitative–qualitative argument should be removed from the agenda, so that significant and important a priori choices may be given due attention instead.
机译：本文涉及围绕定量-定性方法的伪问题的全面但毫无意义的修辞。本文中有两个问题需要澄清。首先，方法一词的含义是什么，其次，当进入科学的理论和实践时，该术语应受到什么限制。基于对这两个方面的研究，我们随后讨论了定量定性论证的含义。我们的推理得出的结论是，应从议程中删除定量-定性论证，以便对重要的和重要的先验选择给予适当的关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号