...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Gas anxiety and the charging choices of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle drivers
【24h】

Gas anxiety and the charging choices of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle drivers

机译：汽油焦虑和插电式混合动力汽车驾驶员的充电选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) can provide many of the benefits of battery electric vehicles (BEVs), such as reduced petroleum consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, without the “range anxiety” that can accompany driving a vehicle with limited range when there are few charging opportunities. However, evidence indicates that PHEVs are often plugged in more frequently than BEVs in practice. This is somewhat paradoxical: drivers for whom plugging in is optional tend to do so more frequently than those for whom it is necessary. This has led to the coining of a new term – “gas anxiety” – to describe the apparent desire of PHEV drivers to avoid using gasoline. In this paper, we analyze the variables influencing the charging choices of PHEV owners, testing whether drivers express preferences consistent with the concept of gas anxiety. We analyze data collected in a web-based stated preference survey using a latent class logit model. The results reveal two classes of decision-making patterns among the survey respondents: (1) those who weight the cost of gasoline and the cost of recharging approximately equally (the cost-minimizing class), and (2) those who weight the cost gasoline more heavily than the cost of recharging (the gas anxiety class). Respondents in the gas anxiety class expressed a willingness to recharge at a charging station even when doing so would cost approximately four times as much as the cost of the gasoline avoided. While the gas anxiety class represents the majority of our sample, more recent PHEV adopters are more likely to be in the cost-minimizing class. Looking forward, this suggests that public charging station operators may need to price charging competitively with gasoline on a per-mile basis to attract PHEV owners.
机译：插电式混合动力汽车（PHEV）可以提供电池电动汽车（BEV）的许多好处，例如减少石油消耗和温室气体排放，而没有“范围焦虑”，而在这种情况下驾驶范围有限的汽车会伴随充电的机会很少。但是，有证据表明，在实践中，插电式混合动力汽车的插电频率通常高于插电式混合动力汽车。这有点自相矛盾：可以选择插入驱动程序的驱动程序比那些需要插入驱动程序的驱动程序执行频率更高。这导致了一个新名词的诞生：“汽油焦虑症”，用以描述插电式混合动力汽车驾驶员避免使用汽油的明显愿望。在本文中，我们分析了影响PHEV车主充电选择的变量，测试驾驶员是否表达了与汽油焦虑概念一致的偏好。我们使用潜在类logit模型分析在基于Web的陈述式偏好调查中收集的数据。结果揭示了受访者中的两类决策模式：（1）权衡汽油成本和充电成本大致相等的人（最小成本阶层）；（2）权衡汽油成本的那些人比充电的费用（汽油焦虑症）要重得多。汽油焦虑程度的受访者表示愿意在充电站进行充电，即使这样做的成本大约是避免汽油成本的四倍。虽然气体焦虑症是我们样本中的大多数，但最近采用PHEV的使用者更可能属于成本最低的类别。展望未来，这表明公共充电站运营商可能需要以每英里为基础对汽油进行竞争性定价，以吸引PHEV所有者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号