...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Would personal carbon trading reduce travel emissions more effectively than a carbon tax?
【24h】

Would personal carbon trading reduce travel emissions more effectively than a carbon tax?

机译：个人碳交易会比碳税更有效地减少旅行排放吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The application of personal carbon trading (PCT) to transport choices has recently been considered in the literature as a means of reducing CO_2 emissions. Its potential effectiveness in changing car travel behavior is compared to the conventional carbon tax (CT) by means of a stated preferences survey conducted among French drivers (N ～ 300). We show evidence that PCT could effectively change travel behavior and hence reduce transport emissions from personal travel. There is however a definite reluctance to reduce car travel. We were unable to demonstrate any significant difference between the effectiveness of PCT and the CT with regard to changing travel behavior. However, in the experiment, the PCT scheme provided consistent results while this was not the case for the CT scheme. Further research is needed into the "social norm" conveyed by a personal emissions allowance.
机译：最近在文献中已考虑将个人碳交易（PCT）应用于运输选择，作为减少CO_2排放的一种手段。通过对法国驾驶员（N〜300）进行的既定偏好调查，将其在改变汽车出行行为方面的潜在效力与常规碳税（CT）进行了比较。我们显示出证据表明PCT可以有效地改变旅行行为，从而减少个人旅行带来的运输排放。但是，绝对不愿意减少汽车行驶。我们无法证明PCT和CT在改变旅行行为方面的有效性之间存在任何显着差异。但是，在实验中，PCT方案提供了一致的结果，而CT方案则并非如此。个人排放配额所传达的“社会规范”需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号