...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Water Policy >Hydropolitics and hydropolitical dynamics between India and Nepal: an event-based study
【24h】

Hydropolitics and hydropolitical dynamics between India and Nepal: an event-based study

机译：印度和尼泊尔之间的水政治和水政治动态：基于事件的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

India and Nepal not only share common borders and cultures, but also share precious freshwater sources, i.e., rivers. Rivers have been discussed often in the political corridors because they cross international borders, which transform water reserves into a competitive resource and lead to hydropolitical dynamics between riparian countries. Nepal and India are two of the major riparian nations that share the mighty and complex Ganges Basin. The objective here was to study the more-than-a-century-old hydro-diplomacy between India and Nepal, passing through tumultuous political scenarios to understand how water relations have been shaped and reshaped with time. For this, a database of historical individual events/actions of water cooperation and conflict from 1874 to 2014 was compiled. These events/actions were ranked by intensity, using precise definitions of conflict and cooperation as suggested by the Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database under the Basins at Risk project formulated at Oregon State University. Statistical analyses indicated cooperative events greatly outnumbered conflictive events. Out of 351 events, only 4% were conflictive, 92% were cooperative, and the remaining 4% were neutral. The study revealed an abundance of cooperative events; however, when seen through the lens of conflict-cooperation levels, the findings indicated a moderately positive cooperation, without much concrete action.
机译：印度和尼泊尔不仅共享共同的边界和文化，而且还共享宝贵的淡水源，即河流。人们在政治走廊中经常讨论河流，因为它们跨越了国际边界，这将水储量转化为竞争性资源，并导致沿岸国家之间的水政治动态。尼泊尔和印度是拥有强大而复杂的恒河盆地的两个主要河岸国家。这里的目的是研究印度和尼泊尔之间长达一个多世纪的水力外交，通过动荡的政治形势来了解水关系如何随着时间而改变和重塑。为此，汇编了1874年至2014年水合作与冲突的历史性个人事件/活动的数据库。根据俄勒冈州立大学制定的“处于风险中的盆地”项目下的跨界淡水争端数据库所建议的冲突和合作的精确定义，对这些事件/行动进行了强度排序。统计分析表明，合作事件大大超过冲突事件。在351个事件中，只有4％是冲突的，92％是合作的，其余4％是中立的。该研究表明存在大量合作事件。但是，从冲突合作水平的角度来看，调查结果表明存在适度积极的合作，没有采取具体行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号