...
首页> 外文期刊>Work & Stress >Ten years on: A review of recent research on the Job Demand-Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being
【24h】

Ten years on: A review of recent research on the Job Demand-Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being

机译:十年:回顾工作需求控制(-支持)模型和心理健康的最新研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 1999, van der Doef and Maes published a systematic review focusing on the Job-Demand-Control (JDC) model (Karasek, 1979) and the Job Demand-Control (-Support) (JDCS) model (Johnson & Hall, 1988) in relation to psychological well-being. Their review covered the period from 1979 to 1997. The present paper updates and extends this review. Covering research from 83 studies published between 1998 and 2007, our review revealed three major results: First, support for additive effects of demands, control, and social support on general psychological well-being is almost always found if the sample size is sufficient. Second, although there was consistent evidence for additive effects in relation to job-related well-being in cross-sectional studies, support rates were lower in longitudinal data. Thus, reciprocal or reversed causation might account for part of the association between JDC/JDCS dimensions and job-related well-being. Finally, evidence for interactive effects as predicted by the buffer hypotheses of the JDC/JDCS model was very weak overall. However, the pattern of results indicates that this is due neither to spurious evidence for such interactions nor to small effect sizes. Instead, our results suggest that buffering effects depend on whether or not demands and control are based on qualitatively identical JDC/JDCS dimensions (matching principle).
机译:1999年,van der Doef和Maes发表了一篇系统综述,重点关注工作需求控制(JDC)模型(Karasek,1979年)和工作需求控制(-支持)(JDCS)模型(Johnson&Hall,1988年)与心理健康有关。他们的审查涵盖了从1979年到1997年的这段时间。本文对这一审查进行了更新和扩展。涵盖1998年至2007年间发表的83项研究的研究结果,我们的审查揭示了三个主要结果:首先,如果样本量足够,几乎总是可以找到对需求,控制和社会支持对总体心理健康的累加效应的支持。其次,尽管在横断面研究中有一致的证据表明与工作相关的幸福感有累加效应,但纵向数据的支持率较低。因此,互为因果或反向因果关系可能是JDC / JDCS维度与工作相关幸福感之间联系的一部分。最后,总体而言,JDC / JDCS模型的缓冲假设所预测的相互作用效应的证据。但是,结果的模式表明,这既不是由于这种相互作用的虚假证据,也不是由于效应较小。相反,我们的结果表明,缓冲效果取决于需求和控制是否基于定性相同的JDC / JDCS维度(匹配原理)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号