...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>World intellectual property report >Drug Commodity Name Protection - A Pitfall in China's New Revised Trademark Law?
【24h】

Drug Commodity Name Protection - A Pitfall in China's New Revised Trademark Law?

机译：药品商品名称保护-中国新修订的商标法的陷阱？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

One of the new provisions of China's revised Trademark Law, to be effective from May 1, 2014 (see "Analysis of China's Revised Trademark Law" [27 WIPR 29, 10/1/13]), is the protection of the priority right of a trademark which is not registered in China but has been used in the country for a certain period of time. According to Article 59 of the law, if a third party has already used a trademark which is identical or similar to the trademark to be registered by the trademark right holder on the same or similar goods, and such trademark has already had a certain impact on the market, a trademark right holder who subsequently registers such trademark cannot prohibit that third party from using the trademark in its original scope, but may request it to make an appropriate sign of distinction. However, if the prior use concerns a commodity name, would it be protected in the same way by the revised Trademark Law? The answer is not entirely clear.
机译：自2014年5月1日起生效的中国修订商标法的新规定之一（请参阅“中国修订商标法的分析” [27 WIPR 29，10/1/13]）。未在中国注册但已在该国使用了一段时间的商标。根据法律第59条，如果第三方已经在商标相同或相似的商品上使用了与商标权人注册的商标相同或相似的商标，并且该商标已经对在市场上，随后注册该商标的商标权利持有人不能禁止该第三方在其原始范围内使用该商标，但可以要求其做出适当的区分标志。但是，如果在先使用涉及商品名称，是否会以修改后的《商标法》以同样的方式受到保护？答案并不完全清楚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号