• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Planning Theory & Practice >Don't mention the culture war: Beyond creative ambiguity and professional 'quietism' in Northern Ireland/North of Ireland spatial planning?
【24h】

Don't mention the culture war: Beyond creative ambiguity and professional 'quietism' in Northern Ireland/North of Ireland spatial planning?

机译：不要提及文化大战：除了北爱尔兰/北爱尔兰空间规划中的创意模棱两可和专业的“安静主义”之外？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The breakdown of political talks in Belfast over Christmas in 2013 dealing with how the legacy of conflict (including its spatial expression) and frictions involving symbolic spatial markers (flags, parades and commemorations) should be handled, came as no surprise to many who saw chickens (if not turkeys) coming home to roost. While these talks, facilitated by US diplomatic envoy Richard Haass, grappled with warring narratives of conflict amidst a faltering peace process, the lack of any spatial planning voice from either the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) or Irish Planning Institute (IPI) in the over 600 submissions to the initiative should not go unacknowledged. As I argued 15 years ago, since at the nub of the peace process is the issue of how identities can be given agreed and officially legitimised forms of expression, the profound link between identity and place makes this issue also very much a spatial planning matter (Neill, 1999, p. 273). If, as a recent editorial in this journal has argued (Campbell, 2010, p. 473), that the planning profession needs to be less risk averse, this Haass self-imposed exclusion must be seen as an important opportunity missed. The constraints involved, discussed below, do not, it is argued, excuse it. While discussion is focused on planning amidst conflict in Northern Ireland, the point that planners have a responsibility to stimulate spatial imaginations has more general applicability.
机译：2013年圣诞节在贝尔法斯特举行的政治对话破裂，涉及如何处理冲突的遗产（包括其空间表达）和涉及象征性空间标志（标志，游行和纪念）的摩擦，这对于许多看过鸡的人来说不足为奇（如果不是火鸡）回家栖息。尽管这些谈判是在美国外交使节理查德·哈斯（Richard Haass）的协助下进行的，但在和平进程步履蹒跚的过程中，人们对冲突的交战叙事进行了努力，但皇家城市规划研究所（RTPI）或爱尔兰规划研究所（IPI）都缺乏空间规划的声音。不应超过600份提交给该计划的意见书。正如我15年前所论证的那样，由于在和平进程的核心问题是如何赋予人们认同的和正式合法化的表现形式，因此身份与场所之间的深刻联系使这个问题在很大程度上也成为空间规划的问题（尼尔，1999年，第273页）。正如该杂志最近的社论所指出的那样（Campbell，2010年，第473页），如果规划界需要减少风险规避，那么必须将这种哈斯自我强加的排斥视为错过了一个重要机会。有人争辩说，下面讨论的有关制约因素不能成为借口。尽管讨论的重点是在北爱尔兰的冲突中进行规划，但规划人员有责任激发空间想象力这一观点具有更广泛的适用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号