Variations in how physiotherapists understand their work on organizational and societal levels.

Boll M; Rosenqvist U

首页> 外文期刊>Physiotherapy research international: the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy >Variations in how physiotherapists understand their work on organizational and societal levels.

【24h】

Variations in how physiotherapists understand their work on organizational and societal levels.

机译：物理治疗师在组织和社会层面上理解其工作的方式有所不同。

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Background and Purpose. Many physiotherapists have moved from treating persons on individual and group levels to working in different service positions on organizational and societal levels within healthcare organizations. The present study has investigated how physiotherapists working on those levels understand their job. The aim of the study was to describe variations in physiotherapists' understanding of their work on organizational and societal levels within healthcare organizations. The research question was: how do physiotherapists understand their work on organizational and societal levels? Method. A phenomenographic approach was chosen. Physiotherapists working in different positions on organizational and societal levels were interviewed. Results. Among our 21 informants we found three logically interrelated categories: 'exploring and performing an assignment', 'interactive learning and balancing support' and 'moving within a continually changing structure'. These three categories of descriptions formed an outcome space of ways of understanding work on organizational and societal levels within healthcare organizations. Conclusions. The findings in this study can be used as tools in professional discussions on how ways of understanding work have an impact on how work is performed and how change is achieved. Copyright (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

机译：背景和目的。许多物理治疗师已从在个人和团体级别上对待患者转移到在医疗组织内的组织和社会级别上担任不同的服务职位。本研究调查了在这些级别上工作的物理治疗师如何理解其工作。这项研究的目的是描述理疗师对他们在医疗保健组织内在组织和社会层面上的工作理解的差异。研究的问题是：物理治疗师如何理解他们在组织和社会层面的工作？方法。选择了现象学方法。采访了在组织和社会层面上担任不同职务的物理治疗师。结果。在我们的21位线人中，我们发现了三个在逻辑上相互关联的类别：“探索和执行任务”，“交互式学习和平衡支持”以及“在不断变化的结构中移动”。这三类描述形成了在医疗保健组织中理解组织和社会层面工作方式的结果空间。结论。这项研究的结果可以用作专业讨论中的工具，以了解理解工作的方式如何影响工作的执行方式以及如何实现变化。版权所有（c）2010 John Wiley＆Sons，Ltd.

著录项

来源
《Physiotherapy research international: the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy》 |2011年第2期|共8页
作者
Boll M; Rosenqvist U;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类治疗学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Variations in how physiotherapists understand their work on organizational and societal levels. [J] . Boll M, Rosenqvist U Physiotherapy research international: the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy . 2011,第2期

机译：物理治疗师在组织和社会层面上理解其工作的方式有所不同。
2. Exploring communication networks to understand organizational crisis using exponential random graph models [J] . Shahadat Uddin, Jafar Hamra, Liaquat Hossain Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory . 2013,第1期

机译：探索通信网络以使用指数随机图模型了解组织危机
3. Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs. [J] . Weiner BJ, Lewis MA, Linnan LA Health education research . 2009,第2期

机译：使用组织理论来了解有效实施工作场所健康促进计划的决定因素。
4. An Organizational Model to Understand the Creativity Workshop [C] . Pedro Chávez Barrios, Davy Monticolo, Sahbi Sidhom, International Conference on Signal-Image Technology and Internet-Based Systems . 2017

机译：理解创意工作坊的组织模型
5. Humanitarian Information Management Network Effectiveness: An Analysis at the Organizational and Network Levels. [D] . Ngamassi Tchouakeu, Louis-Marie. 2011

机译：人道主义信息管理网络的有效性：在组织和网络级别的分析。
6. Adoption and sustained use of cleaner cooking fuels in rural India: a case control study protocol to understand household network and organizational drivers [O] . Praveen Kumar, Amar Dhand, Rachel G. Tabak, 2017

机译：印度农村地区采用和持续使用更清洁的烹饪燃料：案例研究方案以了解家庭网络和组织驱动因素
7. Home > All Content > Vol 50, No 1 (2019) Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development Cover Page Edited by: James Georgalakis and Pauline Rose June 2019 Volume 50 Issue 1 This issue aims to identify how partnerships focused on the production of policy-engaged research seek to achieve societal impact and explores the challenges in these processes. The collaborations analysed span academia, civil society and government, from the grassroots to the national and global levels. By locating these examples within the broader debates on interactions between researchers and research users designed to strengthen evidence informed decision making, this publication offers concepts and practices to inform those funding, designing and undertaking development research. The featured case studies are explored through the perspectives of both researchers and their partners in civil society and policy. They are predominantly taken from a diverse portfolio of research projects funded through the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Department for International Development (DFID) Strategic Partnership. A collaboration with the Impact Initiative, this IDS Bulletin is essential reading for all those in research organisations, development agencies and donors committed to the better use of evidence and learning for development. Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.100 ABSTRACT FULL ISSUE PDF Foreword Diana Dalton DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.102 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Introduction: Identifying the Qualities of Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development – A New Analytical Framework James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.103 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Rethinking Research Impact through Principles for Fair and Equitable Partnerships Kate Newman, Sowmyaa Bharadwaj, Jude Fransman DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.104 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Pathways to Impact: Insights from Research Partnerships in Uganda and India Rachel Hinton, Rona Bronwin, Laura Savage DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.105 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Exploring Partnerships between Academia and Disabled Persons’ Organisations: Lessons Learned from Collaborative Research in Africa Maria Kett, Mark T. Carew, John-Bosco Asiimwe, Richard Bwalya, Anderson Gitonga, Boakai A. Nyehn, Joyce Olenja, Leslie Swartz, Nora Groce DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.106 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Layered and Linking Research Partnerships: Learning from YOUR World Research in Ethiopia and Nepal Vicky Johnson, Anannia Admassu, Andrew Church, Jill Healey, Sujeeta Mathema DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.107 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Fundamental Challenges in Academic–Government Partnership in Conflict Research in the Pastoral Lowlands of Ethiopia Mercy Fekadu Mulugeta, Fana Gebresenbet, Yonas Tariku, Ekal Nettir DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.108 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Regional Research–Policy Partnerships for Health Equity and Inclusive Development: Reflections on Opportunities and Challenges from a Southern African Perspective [O] . Nicola Yeates, Themba Moeti, Mubita Luwabelwa 2019

机译：主页>所有内容> Vol 50，第1号（2019年）探索国际发展顾客的研究 - 政策伙伴关系：詹姆斯格拉巴拉斯和波雷琳上升2019年6月50卷第1卷这个问题旨在确定合作伙伴关系如何关注政策的生产。 - 繁殖的研究寻求实现社会影响并探索这些过程中的挑战。合作分析了跨度学术界，民间社会和政府，从基层到国家和全球层面。通过在研究人员和研究用户之间的相互作用的更广泛辩论中找到这些示例，旨在加强证据明智的决策，本出版物提供了通知这些资金，设计和开发研究的概念和实践。通过研究人员及其合作伙伴在民间社会和政策的角度来看，探讨了特色案例研究。它们主要从英国经济和社会研究委员会（ESRC）和国际发展部（DFID）战略伙伴部资助的各种研究项目组合中获取。与影响计划的合作，此IDS公告是研究组织，发展机构和捐助者致力于更好地利用证据和学习发展的所有人的重要阅读。探索研究 - 在国际发展中的研究 - 政策伙伴关系James Georgalakis，Pauline Rose Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.100 Abstract完整发行PDF前言戴安娜DALTON DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.102抽象PDFONLINE文章简介：确定国际发展中研究政策伙伴关系的质量 - 新的分析框架詹姆斯·乔治拉斯·罗琳·罗拉克斯：10.19088 / 1968-2019.103抽象Pdfonline文章通过公平和公平合作伙伴关系的原则重新思考研究影响凯特纽曼，Sowmyaa Bharadwaj，Jude Fransman Do：10.19088 / 1968-2019.104抽象Pdfonline文章途径影响：来自乌干达和印度Rachel Hinton，RONA Bronwin，Laura Bronwin的研究伙伴关系的见解：10.19088 / 1968-2019.105抽象的PDFonline文章探讨了学术界和残疾人士组织之间的伙伴关系：从非洲玛丽亚凯特的合作研究中吸取的经验教训。克鲁，约翰 - 博斯科阿斯蒂姆韦，理查德Bwalya，安德rson gitonga，Boakai A. Nyehn，Joyce Olenja，Leslie Swartz，Nora Groce Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.106 Abstract Pdfonline文章分层和链接研究合作伙伴关系：从您的世界研究中学习在埃塞俄比亚和尼泊尔Vicky Johnson，Anannia Admassu，安德鲁教堂的世界研究， JILL HEALELY，SUJETA MATHEMA DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.107抽象PDFONLINE文章在学术界政府伙伴关系中的基本挑战在冲突研究中埃塞俄比亚牧场的牧区牧场地区牧羊犬MULUGETA，宇瓦·塔利克（Ekal Nettir Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.108摘要PDFONLINE文章区域研究 - 健康股权和包容性发展的政策伙伴关系：关于南部非洲观点的机遇和挑战的思考

Variations in how physiotherapists understand their work on organizational and societal levels.

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅