• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative health research >Understanding the role of communities of practice in evidence-informed decision making in public health
【24h】

Understanding the role of communities of practice in evidence-informed decision making in public health

机译：了解实践社区在公共卫生中以证据为依据的决策中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this article we report on qualitative findings that describe public health practitioners' practice-based definitions of evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) and communities of practice (CoP), and how CoP could be a mechanism to enhance their capacity to practice EIDM. Our findings emerged from a qualitative descriptive analysis of group discussions and participant concept maps from two consensus-building workshops that were conducted with public health practitioners (N = 90) in two provinces in eastern Canada. Participants recognized the importance of EIDM and the significance of integrating explicit and tacit evidence in the EIDM process, which was enhanced by CoP. Tacit knowledge, particularly from peers and personal experience, was the preferred source of knowledge, with informal peer interactions being the favored form of CoP to support EIDM. CoP helped practitioners build relationships and community capacity, share and create knowledge, and build professional confidence and critical inquiry. Participants described individual and organizational attributes that were needed to enable CoP and EIDM.
机译：在本文中，我们报告了定性发现，这些发现描述了公共卫生从业人员基于实践的循证决策（EIDM）和实践社区（CoP）的定义，以及CoP如何成为增强其实践EIDM能力的机制。我们的发现来自对加拿大东部两个省的公共卫生从业人员（N = 90）进行的两次共识建立研讨会的小组讨论和参与者概念图的定性描述分析。与会者认识到EIDM的重要性以及在EIDM流程中整合明示和默示证据的重要性，CoP对此有所增强。隐性知识（尤其是来自同伴和个人经验的隐性知识）是首选的知识来源，非正式的同伴交互是支持EIDM的CoP的首选形式。 CoP帮助从业人员建立关系和社区能力，分享和创造知识，建立专业信心和进行批判性询问。参与者描述了启用CoP和EIDM所需的个人和组织属性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号