首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative health research >Art and science in health care research: Pushing at open doors or locked in institutions?
【24h】

Art and science in health care research: Pushing at open doors or locked in institutions?

机译:卫生保健研究中的艺术和科学:是推开大门还是被锁在机构中?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Research methods are usually dictated and driven by the research question. In the context of research in "closed" systems-for example, offender health settings-it is imperative that the research question takes into consideration the context in which the research is located. Conducting research that has action, transformation, and creativity at its heart is a significant challenge in closed cultures, for both the researcher and the researched. Using two exemplars, we question whether researchers should adopt a safe approach to researching these closed cultures and to what extent they should engage in methodological tensions and ethical dilemmas that provoke and support reflection on change. By reflecting on our previous research studies, we aim not so much to provide a definitive answer to this question but to suggest that researchers give careful consideration to the methods appropriate to both the context of the research and its purpose.
机译:研究方法通常由研究问题决定和驱动。在“封闭式”系统中进行研究时(例如,犯罪者的健康状况),研究问题必须考虑到研究所在的环境。对于研究者和被研究者而言,开展以行动,变革和创造力为核心的研究是封闭文化中的重大挑战。我们使用两个示例来质疑研究人员是否应该采用安全的方法来研究这些封闭的文化,以及他们应在多大程度上应对引发和支持对变革的反思的方法论张力和道德困境。通过反思我们以前的研究,我们的目的不是为这个问题提供一个明确的答案,而是建议研究人员仔细考虑适用于研究背景及其目的的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号