...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Psychiatry research >Validity of the mental health component scale of the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (MCS-12) as measure of common mental disorders in the general population.
【24h】

Validity of the mental health component scale of the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (MCS-12) as measure of common mental disorders in the general population.

机译：12项简短形式健康调查（MCS-12）中的心理健康成分量表可以作为衡量普通人群中常见精神障碍的有效方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study assessed the screening utility of the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey's (SF-12) mental health component scale (MCS-12) for diagnosable depression and anxiety disorders in a general population sample, and thus, the validity of this scale as a measure of mental health in epidemiological research. Data were from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing (N=10,504). Diagnoses were made using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. The MCS-12 was compared to other brief scales: the RAND Mental Health Component scale (RAND MHC-12, an alternative scoring method for the MCS-12), the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10 and K6), and an estimate of the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5). The MCS-12 and RAND MHC-12 were equally able to discriminate respondents with the target diagnoses. The MCS-12 performed better than the GHQ-12, and equally to the K6 for diagnoses of depression, though not anxiety disorders, where theK6 showed greater utility. The K10 out-performed the MCS-12 for all diagnoses. Areas under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC) indicated that the MCS-12 is valid measure of mental health in epidemiological research, and a useful screening tool for both depression (AUC=0.92) and anxiety disorders (AUC=0.83).
机译：这项研究评估了12项简短形式健康调查（SF-12）精神健康成分量表（MCS-12）在一般人群样本中可诊断的抑郁症和焦虑症的筛查效用，因此该量表的有效性作为流行病学研究中心理健康的衡量标准。数据来自澳大利亚全国心理健康和幸福调查（N = 10,504）。使用综合国际诊断访谈进行诊断。将MCS-12与其他简短量表进行了比较：RAND心理健康成分量表（RAND MHC-12，MCS-12的替代评分方法），12个项目的一般健康问卷（GHQ-12），凯斯勒心理学痛苦量表（K10和K6）以及心理健康清单的估计值（MHI-5）。 MCS-12和RAND MHC-12同样能够区分目标诊断对象。在诊断抑郁症方面，MCS-12的表现优于GHQ-12，对K6的表现也同样好于K6，尽管在焦虑症方面却并非如此，其中K6的效用更大。在所有诊断中，K10的性能均优于MCS-12。接收者工作特征曲线（AUC）下的区域表明，MCS-12是流行病学研究中心理健康的有效度量，并且是抑郁症（AUC = 0.92）和焦虑症（AUC = 0.83）的有用筛查工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号