• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Urban Forestry & Urban Greening >'No place for wilderness': Urban parks and the assembling of neoliberal urban environmental governance
【24h】

'No place for wilderness': Urban parks and the assembling of neoliberal urban environmental governance

机译：“没有荒野的地方”：城市公园和新自由主义城市环境治理的集合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

For well over a decade, urban political ecology has been concerned with the neoliberalization of infrastructure as a key site of struggle in the reproduction of urban space. While urban forests, trees, and parks have not featured as prominently in that literature as other resources (e.g., water), they are increasingly managed and promoted as a form of "green" infrastructure by city governments eager to ally themselves with new environmentally-oriented framings of the modern city. Yet, the relationship between these new forms of green infrastructure and the neoliberalization of the city, in particular their ability to enable new ways of taking about the city and nature, and to constrain others, has been understudied. In this paper, I examine the ways in which urban parks are enrolled in political struggles to reorient the techniques of urban governance toward entrepreneurialism as the only viable model for economic development. Through a case study of Philadelphia's Fairmount Park System, I examine a series of events during the previous three decades in which Fairmount Park has become subject to this reorientation toward entrepreneurialism. Specifically, I examine how parks, no longer treated as spaces of "nature", have been reframed as self-supporting constituents of a business-minded urbanism, promotional tools for the attraction of new labor to the city, and a reinforcement of the notion of entrepreneurialism as the inevitable urban development strategy for the 21st century. Yet, I also argue that these transformations are always in a process of negotiation. Even as parks become subject to these dominating discourses, new park construction is a site in which the conceptual assumptions that underpin neoliberal urban policy aren't frictionlessly transferred from one instance to another but, even when successful, require significant work to overcome competing visions of urban nature. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
机译：十多年来，城市政治生态一直关注基础设施的新自由化，这是城市空间再生产的主要斗争地点。尽管城市森林，树木和公园在文献中没有像其他资源（例如水）那样突出，但它们被越来越多的城市政府以“绿色”基础设施的形式进行管理和推广，他们渴望通过新的环境友好型社区来团结自己。面向现代城市的框架。然而，人们已经研究了这些新形式的绿色基础设施与城市的新自由化之间的关系，特别是它们采用新的方式来处理城市和自然，以及约束其他事物的能力。在本文中，我研究了将城市公园纳入政治斗争的方式，以将城市管理技术重新定向为企业家精神，将其作为经济发展的唯一可行模式。通过对费城费尔蒙特公园系统的案例研究，我考察了过去三十年中的一系列事件，其中费尔蒙特公园已受到这种对企业家精神的重新定位。具体而言，我研究了如何将不再被视为“自然”空间的公园改组为具有商业意识的城市主义的自力更生成分，如何将吸引新劳动力吸引到城市的促销工具以及对概念的强化企业家精神是21世纪城市发展的必然策略。但是，我也认为，这些转型始终处于谈判过程中。即使公园受到这些支配性话题的支配，新公园建设仍是一个站点，在该站点中，支持新自由主义城市政策的概念性假设并非毫不费力地从一个实例转移到另一个实例，但是即使成功，也需要进行大量工作来克服关于竞争的观点。城市自然。 （C）2016 Elsevier GmbH。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号