...
首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Single-center comparison of complications in laparoscopic and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with ultrasound guidance for renal tumors
【24h】

Single-center comparison of complications in laparoscopic and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with ultrasound guidance for renal tumors

机译:超声引导下腹腔镜和经皮射频消融与超声引导下并发症的单中心比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To report on postoperative complications associated with laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) in a single-center experience. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records for patients undergoing LRFA or PRFA between February 2006 and March 2010 at our center. Demographics, radiographic variables, and complication rates were compared between the 2 groups. Risk factors for postoperative complications after operation were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression. Results: Of a total 191 patients included in this study, 132 underwent LRFA and 59 underwent PRFA. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to age, gender, biopsy data, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, body mass index, single kidney, tumor size, tumor number, glomerular filtration rate, follow-up, or RENAL nephrometry score. We observed complications in 16 LRFA procedures (12.1%) and 10 PRFA procedures (16.9%) (P =.369). There was no difference in the distribution of the complications between LRFA and PRFA groups. The complication (grades 1 and 2) rate in the LRFA group (7.6%) was not significantly different from that in the PRFA group (10.2%) (P =.550). The complication (grade 3a) rate in the LRFA group (4.5%) was not significantly different from that in the PRFA group (6.8%) (P =.522). A multivariate analysis disclosed that extra ablation time was the only predictor of postoperative complications. Conclusion: Significantly more anterior tumors were approached laparoscopically, and significantly more posterior tumors were approached percutaneously. Complication rate was not significantly different between LRFA and PRFA. Extra ablation time was a significant risk factor associated with postoperative complications.
机译:目的:报告单中心经验与腹腔镜射频消融(LRFA)和经皮射频消融(PRFA)相关的术后并发症。方法:我们对2006年2月至2010年3月之间接受LRFA或PRFA治疗的患者的病历进行了回顾性审查。比较两组的人口统计学,放射学变量和并发症发生率。采用多元逻辑回归分析分析术后并发症的危险因素。结果:本研究纳入的191例患者中,有132例接受了LRFA,有59例接受了PRFA。两组之间在年龄,性别,活检数据,美国麻醉医师学会分类,体重指数,单肾,肿瘤大小,肿瘤数目,肾小球滤过率,随访或RENAL肾功能评分方面无显着差异。 。我们观察到16例LRFA手术(12.1%)和10例PRFA手术(16.9%)的并发症(P = .369)。 LRFA和PRFA组之间并发症的分布没有差异。 LRFA组(7.6%)的并发症发生率(1级和2级)与PRFA组(10.2%)的并发症发生率无显着差异(P = .550)。 LRFA组的并发症(3a级)发生率(4.5%)与PRFA组的并发症(6.8%)无显着差异(P = .522)。多因素分析显示,额外的消融时间是术后并发症的唯一预测因素。结论:腹腔镜下处理的前部肿瘤明显增多,经皮处理的后部肿瘤显着更多。 LRFA和PRFA之间的并发症发生率没有显着差异。额外的消融时间是术后并发症的重要危险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号