...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Urologic oncology >An editor's considerations in publishing industry-sponsored studies
【24h】

An editor's considerations in publishing industry-sponsored studies

机译：编辑在出版行业赞助研究中的注意事项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The fundamental responsibility of a journal editor is to assure that studies accepted for publication provide rigorous original scientific information and reviews that are considered important to the readership. The fundamental requirements of such reports from an editor's perspective include objectivity and transparency in each of the study design, implementation of investigation methods, acquisition of data, inclusive analysis and interpretation of results, appropriate application of statistical methods, presentation of outcomes in the context of a balanced and comprehensive review of relevant literature, and meaningful conclusions. In proceeding on these presumptions, editors then have the responsibility of obtaining rigorous, objective, and constructive reviews of these reports so that they can make an unbiased decision regarding their disposition. The fundamental objective in this is to enhance the ultimate scientific validity and value of the work if and when it is accepted for publication. Guidelines have been advanced by several organizations to identify how such editorial responsibilities can be fulfilled. These guidelines also pertain to investigators, authors, and sponsors of the studies, which the various reports and reviews describe. The present article reviews these guidelines as they relate to both industry-sponsored and investigator-initiated investigations and as relevant to the variety of reports that a scientific/medical journal such as Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations receives for publication. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译：期刊编辑的基本责任是确保接受发表的研究能够提供严格的原始科学信息和评论，这些信息和评论对读者而言很重要。从编辑的角度来看，此类报告的基本要求包括：每个研究设计的客观性和透明性，调查方法的实施，数据的获取，结果的包容性分析和解释，统计方法的适当应用，对相关文献进行平衡而全面的审查，并得出有意义的结论。在进行这些假设时，编辑者有责任对这些报告进行严格，客观和建设性的审查，以便他们可以就其处置做出公正的决定。这样做的根本目的是，在作品被接受出版时，提高其最终的科学有效性和价值。一些组织已经提出了指导方针，以确定如何履行这些编辑职责。这些指南还与研究人员，研究者和研究者有关，各种报告和评论对此进行了描述。本文对这些指南进行了回顾，因为它们既与行业赞助研究人员发起的调查有关，也与诸如泌尿科肿瘤学：研讨会和原始调查之类的科学/医学期刊收到的各种报告相关。 （c）2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号