...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Surgery >Surgical mentors' and mentees' productivity from 1993 to 2006.
【24h】

Surgical mentors' and mentees' productivity from 1993 to 2006.

机译：从1993年到2006年外科导师和受训者的生产率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND: Mentorship in academic surgery is reflected in part by senior surgeon support of younger individuals with their scholarly contributions to the literature. Scholarship is also reflected in the procurement of extramural funding. This study sought to quantify this process in recent years. STUDY DESIGN: All active American Surgical Association and Society of University Surgeons members in the following 2 eras were defined as being mentors (N = 559): 1993 to 1999 (I) and 2000 to 2006 (II). Mentees (N = 7,037) were defined as a primary author associated with the mentor. MEDLINE-cited papers of mentors and mentees were abstracted. Randomly selected mentees from era I and II were examined for academic productivity. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects database was queried for federal research funding for the mentors and mentees. Continuous categoric and logistical regression was used as appropriate. RESULTS: Combining both eras, mentors published a total of 23,558 articles, of which 3,854 were primary and 9,881 were senior authored. Mentor primary-authored papers were more common in era I than era II (mean = 8 vs 6 articles, P < .01), whereas the number of senior-authored papers was similar in both eras (mean = 18 vs 17 papers, P = .09). Fewer mentors had federal funding in era I compared with era II (42% vs 51%, P = .04). More mentees per mentor existed in era I compared with era II (15 +/- 5 vs 9 +/- 4, P < .001). Era I mentees examined in era II (n = 187) were primary and senior author of a mean of 2.5 and 5 articles, respectively. Of this group, 14 (7.5%) had federal funding. The number of primary- and senior-authored articles from the mentee but not their prior mentor correlated with federal funding (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The number of mentees per mentor has decreased in recent years as has primary-authored authors, whereas federal funding has increased for mentors. Overall NIH funding for mentees was low but is related to their productivity with the mentor.
机译：背景：学术手术中的指导部分反映在年轻医生对文献的学术贡献方面，他们得到了高级外科医生的支持。奖学金还体现在采购校外资金方面。这项研究试图量化近年来的这一过程。研究设计：在以下两个时代中，所有活跃的美国外科协会和大学外科医生学会会员都被定义为导师（N = 559）：1993年至1999年（I）和2000年至2006年（II）。导师（N = 7,037）被定义为与导师相关的主要作者。 MEDLINE引用了导师和受训者的论文。对来自第一和第二时代的随机选择的受训者进行了学术效率检查。已向美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）关于科学项目信息的计算机检索数据库，以获取针对导师和受训者的联邦研究经费。适当时使用连续分类和逻辑回归。结果：结合这两个时代，导师共发表了23558篇文章，其中3854篇是主要文章，9881篇是高级作者。在第一阶段，导师的主要论文比第二阶段更为普遍（平均数= 8 vs 6篇文章，P <.01），而在两个时代，高级作者的论文数量均相似（平均数= 18 vs 17篇论文，P = .09）。与第二阶段相比，第一阶段获得联邦资助的导师较少（42％比51％，P = .04）。与时代II相比，时代I中每个导师的受训者更多（15 +/- 5对9 +/- 4，P <.001）。在第二时代（n = 187）接受检查的第一代受训者分别是第一作者和资深作者，平均篇幅为2.5和5条。在这个群体中，有14个（7.5％）有联邦资助。受指导者发表的主要论文和高级作者文章的数量与先前的指导者无关，与联邦资助相关（P <.05）。结论：近年来，每位导师的受训人数与主要作者相比有所减少，而联邦政府对导师的资助有所增加。 NIH为受训者提供的总资金很少，但与他们与受训者的生产率有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号