• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry >The prevalence and correlates of psychological distress in Australian tertiary students compared to their community peers
【24h】

The prevalence and correlates of psychological distress in Australian tertiary students compared to their community peers

机译：与社区同龄人相比，澳大利亚大专学生心理困扰的患病率和相关性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective: To examine differences between university students, vocational education and training (VET) students, tertiary students combined and non-students in the prevalence of psychological distress and the socio-demographic and economic characteristics associated with psychological distress.Method: The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale was used to estimate the prevalence of moderate (16-21) and high (22-50) distress with data from three national surveys: the 2007 Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, the 2007-08 National Health Survey (NHS), and the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing (NSMHWB). Multinomial logistic regression models were also estimated using the HILDA survey to examine any differences in the characteristics associated with moderate and high distress between the groups.Results: There was evidence of a higher prevalence of moderate distress in tertiary students than non-students in the HILDA survey (27.1% vs 21.2%, p < 0.05) and the NSMHWB (27.4% vs 19.5%, p < 0.05), but not the NHS (26.1% vs 22.5%, p > 0.05). However, standardized rates for age and gender attenuated the difference in moderate distress in the HILDA survey and the NSMHWB. The prevalence of high distress was similar between the groups in all three surveys. The multinomial regression analyses using the HILDA survey showed the following subgroups of students to be at a greater risk of high distress relative to those with low distress: younger university students, and university and VET students with financial problems. Compared to VET students and non-students, younger university students and those who worked 1-39 hours per week in paid employment were at a greater risk of high distress.Conclusions: There is evidence that tertiary students have a greater prevalence of moderate, but not high distress than non-students. Financial factors increase the risk of high distress and are likely to take on more importance as the participation rate of socio-economically disadvantaged students increases.
机译：目的：研究大学生，职业教育与培训（VET）学生，大专生与非学生的心理困扰患病率以及与心理困扰相关的社会人口统计学和经济特征之间的差异。方法：凯斯勒心理困扰使用三项全国调查的数据，使用量表来估计中度（16-21）和高（22-50）困扰的发生率：2007年澳大利亚家庭，收入和劳动动态（HILDA）调查，2007-08年国民健康调查（NHS）和2007年全国心理健康状况（NSMHWB）。还使用HILDA调查估计了多项Logistic回归模型，以检验两组之间与中度和高度困扰有关的特征的任何差异。结果：有证据表明，在HILDA中，高中生的患病率高于非学生问卷调查（27.1％vs 21.2％，p <0.05）和NSMHWB（27.4％vs 19.5％，p <0.05），但非NHS（26.1％vs 22.5％，p> 0.05）。但是，在HILDA调查和NSMHWB中，年龄和性别的标准化比率减轻了中度困扰的差异。在所有三个调查中，两组之间的高危患病率相似。使用HILDA调查进行的多项式回归分析显示，与低苦难学生相比，以下子类别的学生面临高苦恼的风险更大：年轻的大学生以及有财务问题的大学和VET学生。与职业教育与培训生和非学生相比，年轻的大学生和每周工作1-39个小时的有薪工作的人患高病的风险更大。结论：有证据表明，大学生的中度患病率较高，但没有非学生的困扰不大。经济因素增加了高困扰的风险，并且随着社会经济上处于不利地位的学生的参与率增加，经济因素可能会变得更加重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号