• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The American psychologist >When Mindfulness Is Therapy Ethical Qualms, Historical Perspectives
【24h】

When Mindfulness Is Therapy Ethical Qualms, Historical Perspectives

机译：当正念是治疗的道德标准时，历史观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the past 20 years, mindfulness therapeutic programs have moved firmly into the mainstream of clinical practice and beyond. As they have, we have also seen the development of an increasingly vocal critique. At issue is often less whether or not these mindfulness practices "work," and more whether there is a danger in dissociating them from the ethical frameworks for which they were originally developed. Mindfulness, the argument goes, was never supposed to be about weight loss, better sex, helping children perform better in school, helping employees be more productive in the workplace, or even improving the functioning of anxious, depressed people. It was never supposed to be a merchandized commodity to be bought and sold. The larger clinical and religious community, however, has not always been troubled by the idea that meditation might sometimes be used as a highly pragmatic remedy for various ailments. Why, then, are people troubled now? This essay is an effort to recapture a bigger historical perspective on current ethical qualms: to move beyond criticism and instead to try to understand the anatomy of our discontent.
机译：在过去的20年中，正念疗法计划已稳步进入临床实践的主流及其他领域。就像他们一样，我们也看到了越来越多的声音评论的发展。这些正念练习是否“起作用”通常不是问题，而更多的是将它们与最初建立它们的道德框架相分离是否存在危险。该论点认为，正念从来都不是关于减轻体重，改善性行为，帮助孩子在学校里表现更好，帮助员工在工作场所提高生产力，甚至改善焦虑，沮丧的人的功能。从来都不认为这是一种买卖的商品。然而，更大的临床和宗教团体并不总是被冥想有时被用作各种疾病的高度实用疗法的想法所困扰。那么，为什么人们现在受到困扰？本文旨在重新审视当前道德观念的更大历史视角：超越批评，而试图理解我们的不满情绪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号