• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The American psychologist >'Everybody Knows Psychology Is Not a Real Science' Public Perceptions of Psychology and How We Can Improve Our Relationship With Policymakers, the Scientific Community, and the General Public
【24h】

'Everybody Knows Psychology Is Not a Real Science' Public Perceptions of Psychology and How We Can Improve Our Relationship With Policymakers, the Scientific Community, and the General Public

机译：“每个人都知道心理学不是一门真正的科学”心理学的公众看法以及我们如何改善与决策者，科学界和公众的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In a recent seminal article, Lilienfeld (2012) argued that psychological science is experiencing a public perception problem that has been caused by both public misconceptions about psychology, as well as the psychological science community's failure to distinguish itself from pop psychology and questionable therapeutic practices. Lilien-feld's analysis is an important and cogent synopsis of external problems that have limited psychological science's penetration into public knowledge. The current article expands upon this by examining internal problems, or problems within psychological science that have potentially limited its impact with policymakers, other scientists, and the public. These problems range from the replication crisis and defensive reactions to it, overuse of politicized policy statements by professional advocacy groups such as the American Psychological Association (APA), and continued overreliance on mechanistic models of human behavior. It is concluded that considerable problems arise from psychological science's tendency to overcommunicate mechanistic concepts based on weak and often unreplicated (or unreplicable) data that do not resonate with the everyday experiences of the general public or the rigor of other scholarly fields. It is argued that a way forward can be seen by, on one hand, improving the rigor and transparency of psychological science, and making theoretical innovations that better acknowledge the complexities of the human experience.
机译：Lilienfeld（2012）在最近的一篇开创性的文章中指出，心理科学正面临着公众认知问题，这是由于公众对心理学的误解以及心理科学界未能将自己与流行心理学和可疑的治疗习惯区分开来而引起的。 Lilienfeld的分析是对外部问题的重要而有力的提要，这些问题限制了心理学科学对公共知识的渗透。本文通过研究内部问题或心理学中可能会限制其对政策制定者，其他科学家和公众影响的问题来扩展此问题。这些问题包括复制危机和对它的防御反应，专业提倡团体（例如美国心理学会（APA））过度使用政治化的政策声明，以及继续过度依赖人类行为的机械模型。可以得出结论，心理科学倾向于基于弱的且通常是不可复制的（或不可复制的）数据过度传播机械概念，这与普通公众的日常经历或其他学术领域的严谨不符，因此产生了很多问题。有人认为，一方面可以通过改善心理学的严谨性和透明度，并进行理论上的创新来更好地认识人类经验的复杂性，从而找到前进的道路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号