...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Social Psychology >Two experimental tests of relational models of procedural justice: Non-instrumental voice and authority group membership
【24h】

Two experimental tests of relational models of procedural justice: Non-instrumental voice and authority group membership

机译：程序正义的关系模型的两个实验检验：非工具声音和权威团体成员

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In both a laboratory experiment (in Australia) using university as the basis of group membership, and a scenario experiment (in India) using religion as the basis of group membership, we observe more favourable respect and fairness ratings in response to an in-group authority than an out-group authority who administers non-instrumental voice. Moreover, we observe in our second experiment that reported likelihood of protest (herein called "social-change voice") was relatively high following non-instrumental voice from an out-group authority, but relatively low following non-instrumental voice from an in-group authority. Our findings are consistent with relational models of procedural justice, and extend the work by examining likely use of alternative forms of voice as well as highlighting the relative importance of instrumentality.
机译：在以大学为团体成员基础的实验室实验（在澳大利亚）和以宗教为团体成员基础的情景实验（在印度）中，我们都观察到了对团体内部的尊重和公正程度的提高而非管理非乐器声音的团体权限。此外，我们在第二个实验中观察到，报告的抗议可能性（以下称为“社会变革声音”）在来自团体外权威的非工具性声音之后相对较高，但是在来自内部权威的非工具性声音之后相对较低。团体权限。我们的发现与程序正义的关系模型是一致的，并且通过研究声音的替代形式的可能使用以及强调工具性的相对重要性来扩展工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号