...
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of cardiology >Impact of drug plans on adherence to and the cost of antihypertensive medications among patients covered by a universal drug insurance program
【24h】

Impact of drug plans on adherence to and the cost of antihypertensive medications among patients covered by a universal drug insurance program

机译:药物计划对全民药物保险计划涵盖的患者依从性和降压药物费用的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: This study aimed to assess the impact of the type of drug plan on adherence to antihypertensive medication treatment as well as the cost of these medications within universal drug insurance programs. Methods: To compare adherence to antihypertensive medication treatment and the cost of antihypertensive medications between adults with public and private drug insurance in the province of Québec, Canada, we reconstructed a matched retrospective cohort by linking data recorded in 3 administrative databases between March 2008 and May 2010. The cohort included 186 privately and 1747 publicly insured patients aged 18-64 years who were treated with 1 or 2 antihypertensive medications. Adherence measured with the proportion of days covered (PDC) over 1 year and the cost of antihypertensive medications were evaluated for new and prevalent users separately. Results: More than 70% of patients were 50-64 years old and 90% of the publicly and 72% of the privately insured patients were using only 1 antihypertensive medication. The mean PDC among new users of 1 antihypertensive medication was 58.8% for privately insured patients and 65.0% for publicly insured patients, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, privately insured patients treated with 2 antihypertensive medications were more likely to be adherent (PDC-P, 15.0%; 95% confidence interval, 7.0-24.0). Privately insured patients (CAD$41.52) had to pay significantly more for their antihypertensive medications than did publicly insured patients (CAD$32.21). Conclusions: The cost of antihypertensive medications was higher for patients with private drug insurance, although adherence was similar in both groups. The results may reflect regulation of dispensing fees for publicly insured patients.
机译:背景:本研究旨在评估药物计划类型对坚持降压药物治疗的影响以及在通用药物保险计划中这些药物的成本。方法:为了比较加拿大魁北克省拥有公共和私人药物保险的成年人对降压药物治疗的依从性和降压药物的费用,我们通过链接2008年3月至5月在3个行政数据库中记录的数据,构建了一个匹配的回顾性队列。 2010年。该队列包括186名18-64岁的私人和1747名接受公共保险的患者,他们接受了1或2种降压药的治疗。分别针对新使用者和普遍使用者评估依从1年内的天数(PDC)比例的依从性和抗高血压药物的成本。结果:超过70%的患者年龄在50-64岁之间,其中90%的患者是公开的,而72%的私人保险患者仅使用了一种降压药。私人购买保险的患者中,使用一种降压药的新使用者的平均PDC为58.8%,而公共保险患者的平均PDC为65.0%,但差异无统计学意义。但是,接受两种降压药治疗的私人保险患者更有可能坚持治疗(PDC-P,15.0%; 95%置信区间,7.0-24.0)。私人保险患者(41.52加元)的抗高血压药费用要比公共保险患者(32.21加元)高得多。结论:尽管两组的依从性相似,但有私人药物保险的患者抗高血压药物的费用较高。结果可能反映了对公共保险患者的配药费用的规定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号