...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy. >Improving the Chances of Manuscript Acceptance: How to Address Peer Reviewers' Comments
【24h】

Improving the Chances of Manuscript Acceptance: How to Address Peer Reviewers' Comments

机译：提高稿件接受的可能性：如何解决同行评审员的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

If you are one of the hundreds of authors who have submitted a manuscript to the CJHP over the past few years, you will have received one or more decision letters in one or more of the following categories: (1) "reject (at the pre-review stage)", (2) "revise and re-review (at the pre-review stage)", (3) "accept -revisions needed" (further subcategorized as "accept after revisions" or "request major revisions"), (4) "reject (after peer review)", or (5) "final accept".Unless your submission was a letter to the editor or an article such as a Practice Spotlight or a Point Counterpoint piece on which you were already working with an associate editor, it is unlikely that your initial decision letter fell into category 5. Thus, your decision letters have probably included comments and suggestions requiring your attention. The purpose of this editorial is to provide authors who have received such letters with tips on how to improve the chances that their manuscripts will be accepted by the CJHP and, more specifically, how to address the comments of both the peer reviewers and the assigned associate editor. These tips are based on decades of my own personal experience as an author, peer reviewer, associate editor, and editor of the CJHP, as well as my experiences as an author, peer reviewer, and editorial board member with numerous other international biomedical journals.
机译：如果您是过去几年向CJHP提交稿件的数百名作者之一，那么您将收到以下一种或多种类别的一份或多份决定信：（1）“拒绝（ -review阶段）”，（2）“ review and re-re-view（在预审阶段）”，（3）“接受-需要修订”（进一步分类为“修订后接受”或“请求主要修订”） ，（4）“拒绝（经过同行评审）”或（5）“最终接受”。除非您提交的是写给编辑的信或诸如您已经在工作的《实践聚光灯》或《 Point Counterpoint》之类的文章在副主编的陪审下，您的初次决定信不太可能属于第5类。因此，您的决定信中可能包含需要引起您注意的评论和建议。这篇社论的目的是为收到此类信函的作者提供一些技巧，以帮助他们提高自己的稿件被CJHP接受的机会，更具体地说，是如何解决同行审稿人和指派的同事的评论编辑。这些技巧基于我数十年来作为CJHP的作者，同行评审，副编辑和编辑的个人经验，以及我作为众多国际生物医学期刊的作者，同行评审和编辑委员会成员的经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号