The authors analyzed the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A, scores of 1,887 subjects. In addition to the usual self-scoring, trained observers also scored the behavioral manifestations of the subjects according to the same standardized criteria during the sessions. Self- and observer-scoring proved to be internally consistent and highly correlated (r =.832). Item-by-item analysis, however, yielded notable differences. Subjects and observers scored items differently in about 20% of the cases; only 3 items showed no systematic bias toward pass or fail. Many subjects' hypnotizability level would be classified differently according to observer categorization (Cohen's Kappa =.563). We suggest reconsidering the objectivity of self-scoring.
展开▼
