首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of drug policy >Harm reduction is not enough for supply side policy: A human rights-based approach offers more
【24h】

Harm reduction is not enough for supply side policy: A human rights-based approach offers more

机译:减少危害不足以实现供应方政策:基于人权的方法可提供更多

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

At the International Harm Reduction Association's 21st international conference in Liverpool in 2010 I organised (with the Transnational Institute and the Institute for Policy Studies) a major session entitled "Harm reduction for producer nations? Farmers' perspectives on the war on drugs". In the run up to the conference and as the discussions unfolded I struggled with the question posed in the title. Can harm reduction be applied to supply side issues? Is it a useful paradigm for this? Does this discussion in fact expose the limits of harm reduction? Reading Greenfield and Paoli's commentary (2012), which sets out their vision of the application of harm reduction to supply-oriented policy, has helped me to clarify my thinking. It can, in a nutshell, be summed up in four broad statements. Each, of course, open to debate.
机译:在2010年于利物浦举行的国际减少危害协会第21届国际会议上,我(与跨国研究所和政策研究所一起)组织了一次重要会议,题为“为生产国减少危害?农民对毒品战争的看法”。在会议开始之前,随着讨论的进行,我努力解决标题中提出的问题。减少危害可以应用于供应方问题吗?这是有用的范例吗?实际上,这种讨论是否暴露了减少危害的局限性?阅读Greenfield和Paoli的评论(2012年),阐明了他们对将减少危害应用于以供应为导向的政策的看法,这有助于我阐明自己的想法。简而言之,可以概括为四个概括性的陈述。当然,每个都可以展开辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号