...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of eating disorders >Comparative validity of the chinese versions of the bulimic inventory test edinburgh and eating attitudes test for DSM-IV eating disorders among high school dance and nondance students in taiwan
【24h】

Comparative validity of the chinese versions of the bulimic inventory test edinburgh and eating attitudes test for DSM-IV eating disorders among high school dance and nondance students in taiwan

机译：中文版爱丁堡流行性感冒清单测试和饮食态度测试对台湾高中舞蹈和非舞蹈学生DSM-IV饮食失调的比较效度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objectives To compare the validity of the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT) and the Bulimic Investigatory Test Edinburgh (BITE) as screening tools for eating disorders (EDs), and to identify a new threshold for each questionnaire to detect ED cases among dance and nondance students. Method Dance students enrolled in high schools with gifted dance programs and nondance students randomly chosen from the same or nearby schools were invited to participate in a 2-phase ED survey. Participants completed the EAT and BITE questionnaires in the first phase. All participants who screened positive and 10% of the participants who screened negative were interviewed blindly using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders Patient Edition. Results The BITE had better accuracy than the EAT in detecting ED in general among both dance and non-dance students. BITE scores of 19 and 16 were the optimal cutoff values for determining ED among dance and nondance students, respectively. The optimal cutoff value for the EAT to diagnose an ED was 19 for dance students and 12 for nondance students. Both questionnaires showed higher sensitivity and lower specificity in dance students than nondance students at the same cutoff points. Discussion The BITE had better diagnostic performance than the EAT in this nonclinical population, although its ability to detect restrictive behaviors is likely as limited as that of the EAT. Plausible explanations for these results and limitations of this study are discussed in the text.
机译：目的比较饮食态度测试（EAT）和爱丁堡狂热调查测试（BITE）作为饮食失调（ED）筛查工具的有效性，并为每个问卷调查确定新的阈值，以检测舞蹈和非舞蹈学生的ED病例。方法选拔参加高级舞蹈课程的高中舞蹈学生和从同一所或附近学校随机选择的非舞蹈学生，邀请他们参加为期2阶段的ED调查。参与者在第一阶段完成了EAT和BITE问卷。使用“ DSM-IV-TR第一轴疾病患者版”的结构化临床访谈对所有筛查阳性的参与者和10％筛查阴性的参与者进行了盲目访谈。结果在舞蹈和非舞蹈学生中，BITE检测ED的准确度均高于EAT。 BITE分数分别为19和16是确定舞蹈和非舞蹈学生ED的最佳分界值。 EAT诊断ED的最佳截止值是舞蹈学生为19，非舞蹈学生为12。在相同的临界点，两个问卷都显示出舞蹈学生比非舞蹈学生更高的敏感性和更低的特异性。讨论在这个非临床人群中，BITE的诊断性能优于EAT，尽管其检测限制性行为的能力可能与EAT一样有限。本文讨论了这些结果的合理解释和本研究的局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号