首页> 外文期刊>The journal of forensic psychiatry & psychology >Severe personality disorder, treatment engagement and the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012: what you need to know
【24h】

Severe personality disorder, treatment engagement and the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012: what you need to know

机译:严重的人格障碍,治疗参与和《 2012年法律援助,判刑和处罚罪犯法》:您需要了解的内容

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Empirical research has demonstrated a link between legal coercion and treatment engagement following conviction among those with severe personality disorder. Legal coercive pressures were often applied by the Indeterminate Sentence for Public Protection (IPP), until it was replaced by the Extended Determinate Sentence by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012. In this paper, it is proposed that use of the new determinate sentence will lessen motivation for treatment engagement. One effect of treatment refusal may be greater reliance by the Secretary of State for Justice on his jurisdiction to transfer prisoners due for release to secure hospital transfers under the Mental Health Act 1983. Not only will this risk posturing undermine the principal aim of the Offender Personality Disorder Implementation Pathway to improve treatment engagement among the target group, it will also have negative implications for medical practitioners working in secure forensic hospitals. To demonstrate what is at stake, the paper briefly recapitulates empirical findings familiar to readers of the journal, before drawing on original unpublished data.
机译:实证研究表明,严重人格障碍患者定罪后法律强制和治疗参与之间存在联系。法律强制性压力通常由不确定的公共保护句子(IPP)施加,直到被《 2012年法律援助,判刑和处罚罪犯法》的“扩大确定的句子”所取代。在本文中,建议使用新的确定句将减少参与治疗的动机。拒绝治疗的一种影响可能是,司法大臣更加依赖司法部长转移根据1983年《精神卫生法》应释放以确保转移医院的囚犯的管辖权。这种冒犯的风险不仅会破坏罪犯人格的主要目的疾病实施途径改善了目标人群的治疗参与度,也将对在安全的法医医院工作的医生产生负面影响。为了说明问题所在,在利用原始未发表的数据之前,论文简要总结了期刊读者熟悉的经验发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号