首页> 外文期刊>The journal of forensic psychiatry & psychology >Understanding China's mental illness defense
【24h】

Understanding China's mental illness defense

机译:了解中国的精神疾病防御

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the mental illness defense in China which is set out in Article 18 of its penal code. Article 18 is also compared to Canada's mental disorder defense which is typical of the insanity defense in many common law countries. Some important terms in China's mental illness defense law are not as well defined as in Canada's mental disorder defense. On the other hand, China's mental illness provision contains both a cognitive element and a volitional (will) element, while Canada's mental disorder defense only contains a cognitive element. In addition, the content of the 'cognitive' factor is different in the two countries' laws. Also, China's criminal law expressly provides for a mitigated punishment (but not a reduced conviction) for those who, due to mental illness, have only partial ability to recognize or control their conduct. Canada has no similar express provision, although partial mental disorder can be taken into account as one of the many unspecified mitigating factors under Canada's sentencing laws. Finally, the article discusses the different approaches in the two countries to providing psychiatric evidence to the courts and provides some data on the frequency, nature and disposition of persons found not responsible due to mental illness.
机译:本文考察了其刑法第18条所规定的中国精神疾病防御。第18条也与加拿大的精神错乱辩护作了比较,后者是许多普通法国家中精神错乱辩护的典型代表。中国的精神疾病防御法中一些重要术语的定义不如加拿大的精神疾病防御法中定义的那么好。另一方面,中国的精神疾病规定既包含认知成分又包含自愿成分(意志),而加拿大的精神障碍防御只包含认知成分。此外,两国法律中“认知”因素的内容也有所不同。此外,中国的刑法明确规定,对那些因精神疾病而仅具有部分能力识别或控制其行为的人,应减轻处罚(但不能减少定罪)。加拿大没有类似的明文规定,尽管根据加拿大量刑法,部分精神障碍可以作为许多未指定的缓解因素之一考虑在内。最后,本文讨论了两国向法院提供精神病学证据的不同方法,并提供了一些关于因精神疾病被发现不负责任的人的频率,性质和处置的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号