...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics: a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics >Recent developments in health law. Wyeth v. Levine: challenging implied pre-emption for drugs.
【24h】

Recent developments in health law. Wyeth v. Levine: challenging implied pre-emption for drugs.

机译：卫生法的最新发展。惠氏诉莱文（Wyeth v。Levine）：挑战默示的毒品先发制人。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In order for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to receive the trust and deference it needs to accomplish its mission, it must be seen as relatively impervious to political manipulation.1 For most of the FDA's history, it has been seen as an institution driven by scientific expertise, not by political maneuvering.2 However, the FDA was increasingly criticized during the Bush administration for politicizing decisions such as rejecting an application to grant the "morning after pill," known as Plan B, over-the-counter (OTC) status for women of all ages.
机译：为了使食品药品监督管理局（FDA）获得完成任务所需的信任和尊重，必须将其视为对政治操纵的相对不渗透。1在FDA的大部分历史中，它一直被视为一种机构2但是，在布什政府期间，FDA越来越受到批评，因为它将决策政治化，例如拒绝以非处方药（B计划）授予“晨丸”的申请。所有年龄段女性的OTC）状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号