• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >The Assessment of sensory detection thresholds on the perineum and breast compared with control body sites
【24h】

The Assessment of sensory detection thresholds on the perineum and breast compared with control body sites

机译：会阴和乳房与对照组相比的感觉检测阈值评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Introduction: Few studies explored multiple sensory detection thresholds on the perineum and breast, but these normative data may provide standards for clinical conditions such as aging, genital and breast surgeries, pathological conditions affecting the genitals, and sexual function. Aims: The aim of this study was to provide normative data on sensory detection thresholds of three sensory modalities on the perineum and breast. Methods: Thirty healthy women aged between 18 and 35 years were assessed on the perineum (clitoris, labia minora, vaginal, and anal margin), breast (lateral, areola, nipple), and control body locations (neck, forearm, abdomen) for three sensory modalities (light touch, pressure, vibration). Main Outcome Measures: Average detection thresholds for each body location and sensory modality and statistical comparisons between the primary genital, secondary sexual, and neutral zones were the main outcome measures. Results: Average detection thresholds for light touch suggest that the neck, forearm, and vaginal margin are most sensitive, and areola least sensitive. No statistical difference is found between the primary and secondary sexual zones, but the secondary sexual zone is significantly more sensitive than the neutral zone. Average detection thresholds for pressure suggest that the clitoris and nipple are most sensitive, and the lateral breast and abdomen least sensitive. No statistical difference is found between the primary and secondary sexual zone, but they are both significantly more sensitive than the neutral zone. Average detection thresholds for vibration suggest that the clitoris and nipple are most sensitive. The secondary sexual zone is significantly more sensitive than the primary and neutral zone, but the latter two show no difference. Conclusion: The current normative data from sensory detection threshold are discussed in terms of providing standard values for research and clinical conditions. Additional analysis from breast volume, body mass index, hormonal contraception, menstrual cycle, and sexual orientation do not seem to influence the results. Sexual abstinence and body piercing may have some impact.
机译：简介：很少有研究探讨会阴和乳房的多个感官检测阈值，但是这些规范性数据可以为临床条件提供标准，例如衰老，生殖器和乳房手术，影响生殖器的病理条件以及性功能。目的：本研究的目的是提供有关会阴和乳房三种感觉方式的感觉检测阈值的标准数据。方法：对30名年龄在18至35岁之间的健康女性进行会阴（阴唇，小阴唇，阴道和肛门边缘），乳房（外侧，乳晕，乳头）和对照身体部位（颈部，前臂，腹部）的评估，三种感觉模式（轻触，压力，振动）。主要指标：主要结果指标是每个身体部位和感觉方式的平均检测阈值以及主要生殖器，次要性和中性区之间的统计比较。结果：轻触的平均检测阈值表明，颈部，前臂和阴道边缘最敏感，乳晕最不敏感。在主要和次要性区之间未发现统计学差异，但次要性区比中性区更敏感。平均压力检测阈值表明，阴蒂和乳头最敏感，而外侧乳房和腹部最不敏感。在主要和次要性区之间未发现统计学差异，但它们均比中性区敏感得多。振动的平均检测阈值表明，阴蒂和乳头最敏感。次要性区比主要和中性区敏感得多，但后两个区没有差异。结论：从感官检测阈值当前的规范性数据进行了讨论，为研究和临床状况提供标准值。从乳房体积，体重指数，激素避孕，月经周期和性取向等方面进行的其他分析似乎并不影响结果。性禁欲和身体穿孔可能会产生一些影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号