...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly journal of experimental psychology: QJEP >The point of no return: A fundamental limit on the ability to control thought and action
【24h】

The point of no return: A fundamental limit on the ability to control thought and action

机译：无回报的点：控制思想和行动的能力的根本限制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Bartlett (1958. Thinking. New York: Basic Books) described the point of no return as a point of irrevocable commitment to action, which was preceded by a period of gradually increasing commitment. As such, the point of no return reflects a fundamental limit on the ability to control thought and action. I review the literature on the point of no return, taking three perspectives. First, I consider the point of no return from the perspective of the controlled act, as a locus in the architecture and anatomy of the underlying processes. I review experiments from the stop-signal paradigm that suggest that the point of no return is located late in the response system. Then I consider the point of no return from the perspective of the act of control that tries to change the controlled act before it becomes irrevocable. From this perspective, the point of no return is a point in time that provides enough "lead time" for the act of control to take effect. I review experiments that measure the response time to the stop signal as the lead time required for response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Finally, I consider the point of no return in hierarchically controlled tasks, in which there may be many points of no return at different levels of the hierarchy. I review experiments on skilled typing that suggest different points of no return for the commands that determine what is typed and the countermands that inhibit typing, with increasing commitment to action the lower the level in the hierarchy. I end by considering the point of no return in perception and thought as well as action.
机译：巴特利特（Bartlett，1958年，《思考》，纽约：基础书籍）将无回报的点描述为对行动的不可撤销的承诺，在此之前逐渐增加了承诺。因此，无回报的观点反映了控制思想和行动的能力的根本限制。我从三个角度回顾了无回信的文献。首先，从受控行为的角度来看，我认为没有回报的点是基础流程的体系结构和解剖结构。我回顾了停止信号范式中的实验，这些实验表明，不返回点位于响应系统的后期。然后，我从控制行为的角度考虑了无回报的观点，即试图在受控行为变得不可撤销之前对其进行更改。从这个角度来看，无回报的时间点是为控制行为提供足够的“提前期”的时间点。我回顾了一些实验，这些实验测量对停止信号的响应时间，作为停止信号范例中抑制响应所需的提前时间。最后，我考虑了层次控制任务中的不归结点，其中在层次结构的不同级别上可能有许多不归结点。我回顾了有关熟练打字的实验，这些实验提出了确定键入内容的命令和禁止打字的反要求的不同无回报点，随着对行为的投入不断增加，层次结构中的级别越低。最后，我考虑了感知，思想和行动都不会返回的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号