...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery: official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons >Smart toe? implant versus buried kirschner wire for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis: A comparative study
【24h】

Smart toe? implant versus buried kirschner wire for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis: A comparative study

机译:聪明的脚趾?植入物与埋入式克氏针进行近端指间关节固定术的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The surgical correction of hammer digits offers a variety of surgical treatments ranging from arthroplasty to arthrodesis, with many options for fixation. In the present study, we compared 2 buried implants for arthrodesis of lesser digit deformities: a Smart Toe? implant and a buried Kirschner wire. Both implants were placed in a prepared interphalangeal joint, did not violate other digital or metatarsal joints, and were not exposed percutaneously. A retrospective comparative study was performed of 117 digits with either a Smart Toe? implant or a buried Kirschner wire, performed from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2010. Of the 117 digits, 31 were excluded because of a lack of 90-day radiographic follow-up. The average follow-up was 94 to 1130 days. The average patient age was 61.47 (range 43 to 84) years. Of the 86 included digits, 48 were left digits and 38 were right. Of the digits corrected, 54 were second digits, 24 were third digits and 8 were fourth digits. Fifty-eight Smart Toe? implants were found (15 with 19-mm straight; 2 with 19-mm angulated; 34 with 16-mm straight; and 7 with 16-mm angulated). Twenty-eight buried Kirschner wires were evaluated. No statistically significant difference was found between the Smart Toe? implants and the buried Kirschner wires, including the rate of malunion, nonunion, fracture of internal fixation, and the need for revision surgery. Of the 86 implants, 87.9% of the Smart Toe? implants and 85.7% of the buried Kirschner wires were in good position (0° to 10° of transverse angulation on radiographs). Osseous union was achieved in 68.9% of Smart Toe? implants and 82.1% of buried Kirschner wires. Fracture of internal fixation occurred in 12 of the Smart Toe? implants (20.7%) and 2 of the buried Kirschner wires (7.1%). Most of the fractured internal fixation and malunions or nonunions were asymptomatic, leading to revision surgery in only 8.6% of the Smart Toe? implants and 10.7% of the buried Kirschner wires. Both the Smart Toe? implant and the buried Kirschner wire offer a viable choice for internal fixation of an arthrodesis of the digit compared with other studies using other techniques.
机译:锤指的手术矫正提供了从关节成形术到关节固定术的多种外科治疗方法,并有许多固定选择。在本研究中,我们比较了2种埋入式植入物用于较小手指畸形的关节固定术:Smart Toe?植入物和基尔施纳埋线。两种植入物均放置在准备好的指间关节中,未侵犯其他指指或meta骨关节,并且未经皮暴露。进行回顾性比较研究,使用Smart Toe?自2007年1月1日至2010年12月31日进行植入或埋藏的Kirschner导线。由于缺乏90天的射线照相随访,在这117个数字中,有31个数字被排除在外。平均随访时间为94到1130天。患者平均年龄为61.47岁(43至84岁)。在包括的86个数字中,左数字为48,右数字为38。在纠正的数字中​​,54位是第二位,24位是第三位,8位是第四位。 58个智能脚趾?发现植入物(15个笔直的直径为19毫米; 2个笔直的直径为19毫米; 34个笔直的直径为16毫米; 7个笔直的直径为16毫米)。评估了28条埋藏的Kirschner导线。智能趾之间没有发现统计学上的显着差异?植入物和Kirschner埋线,包括畸形畸形率,骨不愈合率,内固定骨折和翻修手术的必要性。在86种植入物中,智能脚趾占87.9%?植入物和85.7%的埋藏的Kirschner线处于良好位置(X射线照片上的横向角度为0°至10°)。骨结合在智能脚趾中占68.9%?植入物和82.1%的克氏针埋线。 12个Smart Toe发生内固定骨折?植入物(20.7%)和2条埋没的Kirschner线(7.1%)。大多数骨折的内固定和畸形畸形或骨不愈合无症状,导致仅8.6%的Smart Toe进行翻修手术。植入物和埋入的Kirschner线的10.7%。既是智能脚趾?与使用其他技术进行的其他研究相比,植入物和埋入的Kirschner线为手指的关节固定术提供了一个可行的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号