首页> 外文期刊>Transport Reviews >Road Safety Strategies: A Comparative Framework and Case Studies
【24h】

Road Safety Strategies: A Comparative Framework and Case Studies

机译:道路安全策略:比较框架和案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper proposes a nine-component analytical framework for developing, comparing, and evaluating road safety strategies. The nine components are: (1) vision; (2) objectives; (3) targets; (4) action plan; (5) evaluation and monitoring; (6) research and development; (7) quantitative modelling; (8) institutional framework; and (9) funding. While the first four components are essential for the formulation of a road safety strategy, the remaining components are key to its successful implementation. To demonstrate the usefulness of this comparative framework, we examine the road safety strategies of six selected administrations: Australia, California, Great Britain, Japan, New Zealand, and Sweden. In these case studies, we extract and highlight good practices in the formulation and implementation of their road safety strategies. The proposed framework also provides a systematic approach for assessing road safety strategies in other administrations. The evaluation of the six case studies forms a benchmarking platform for the planning, formulation, and implementation of good practices for road safety strategies.
机译:本文提出了一个由九部分组成的分析框架,用于开发,比较和评估道路安全策略。这九个组成部分是:(1)视觉; (2)目标; (3)目标; (四)行动计划; (五)评估与监督; (六)研发; (7)定量建模; (八)制度框架; (9)资金。前四部分对于制定道路安全战略至关重要,而其余部分则是其成功实施的关键。为了证明该比较框架的有用性,我们研究了六个选定管理部门的道路安全策略:澳大利亚,加利福尼亚,英国,日本,新西兰和瑞典。在这些案例研究中,我们在制定和实施其道路安全策略时提取并强调了良好做法。拟议的框架还提供了一种系统的方法来评估其他主管部门的道路安全策略。对这六个案例研究的评估为道路安全策略的良好实践的规划,制定和实施提供了一个基准平台。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号