...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Trauma, Violence & Abuse; Review Journal >Public Justification of Intimate Partner Violence: A Review of the Literature
【24h】

Public Justification of Intimate Partner Violence: A Review of the Literature

机译：亲密伴侣暴力的公开辩护：文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Understanding the extent to which the general public justifies intimate partner violence (IPV) is necessarily to explain perpetration, victimization, and response to this behavior. This article provides a literature review of quantitative studies measuring IPV justification among the general population. Key word searching of two databases plus bibliographies, and the web yielded 23 studies that provided comparable measures of IPV justification. Results are summarized for the prevalence of IPV justification identified for each country including differences in justification based on the initiating event (e.g., burning food and infidelity), sociodemographic differences in justification and differences across countries. No study identified a zero prevalence of IPV justification and percentages varied considerably across and within countries. Females tended to report a higher rate of IPV justification than males and younger respondents tended to report a higher rate IPV justification than their older counterparts. Further research is needed to understand IPV justification within and across nations as well as to explore the impact this has on IPV prevalence and policy.
机译：了解公众在多大程度上证明了亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）是合理的，这必须解释这种行为的作恶，受害和对策。本文提供了有关在一般人群中测量IPV合理性的定量研究的文献综述。对两个数据库和书目进行关键词搜索，然后在网络上进行了23项研究，这些研究提供了IPV合理性的可比度量。针对每个国家/地区确定的IPV正当性的流行程度总结了结果，包括基于发起事件的正当性差异（例如，烧食物和不忠），社会人口学正当性差异以及国家之间的差异。尚无研究发现IPV合理性为零，且各国之间和国家内部的百分比差异很大。女性倾向于报告IPV正当性的比例高于男性，而年轻受访者倾向于报告IPV正当性的比例高于老年女性。需要进一步的研究来了解国家内部和国家之间IPV的合理性，并探讨其对IPV流行和政策的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号