• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of pharmacy practice >Credentialing of pharmacy technicians in the USA.
【24h】

Credentialing of pharmacy technicians in the USA.

机译：在美国的药房技术人员证书。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

OBJECTIVE: This review will compare the USA and UK regarding pharmacy technicians' roles, it will summarize the current roles and responsibilities of pharmacy technicians in the USA, public perception of pharmacy technicians, pharmacy organizations' perspectives on pharmacy technician credentialing, academic programmes for pharmacy technicians, accreditation of pharmacy technician programmes, pharmacy technician certification exams and differing perspectives on the push for standardized technician training. It will conclude with observations regarding the importance of standardized pharmacy technician training. METHODS: Articles were identified via searches of PubMed and IPA from inception to November 2010 related to credentialing of pharmacy technicians. Search terms included pharmacy technician, pharmacy technician certification, pharmacy registration, technician education and technician requirements. Articles describing the roles and responsibilities of a technician, public perception of technicians, demographics, certification processes and the future of technician roles were included. An Internet search was also performed to identify articles in the lay press related to this topic. KEY FINDINGS: Providing a pharmacy technician with proper training and education is necessary for operating a successful pharmacy. In the USA, mandating a national standardized training programme is the source of the debate. Current rules and regulations regarding the training and education needed for a pharmacy technician vary from state to state in the USA. Attitudes of technicians towards standardized training may be difficult to change. CONCLUSION: This paper provides a review of pharmacy technicians' roles and responsibilities across different pharmacy settings. Although the literature provides some insight, more studies are needed to assess the value and impact of the knowledge and skills possessed by certified pharmacy technicians with standardized training compared with technicians with site-specific or limited training.
机译：目的：本次审查将比较美国和英国在药房技术员角色方面的情况，总结美国药房技术员的当前角色和职责，公众对药房技术员的看法，药房组织对药房技术员资格的观点，药房的学术计划技术人员，药房技术人员计划的认证，药房技术人员认证考试以及推动标准化技术人员培训的不同观点。最后将对标准化药房技术人员培训的重要性进行观察。方法：从开始到2010年11月，通过PubMed和IPA的搜索来鉴定与药房技术人员资格相关的文章。搜索词包括药房技术员，药房技术员证书，药房注册，技术员教育和技术员要求。包括描述技术员的角色和职责，技术员的公众看法，人口统计，认证过程以及技术员角色的未来的文章。还进行了Internet搜索，以识别非公开印刷中与此主题相关的文章。主要发现：为使药房成功运营，必须为药房技术人员提供适当的培训和教育。在美国，强制性的国家标准化培训计划是辩论的源头。在美国各地，有关药房技术人员所需的培训和教育的现行法规各不相同。技术人员对标准化培训的态度可能难以改变。结论：本文综述了不同药房环境下药房技术人员的角色和职责。尽管文献提供了一些见识，但与经过现场特定培训或有限培训的技术人员相比，需要更多的研究来评估经过标准化培训的认证药房技术人员所拥有的知识和技能的价值和影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号