...
首页> 外文期刊>Health economics >Saving lives versus life-years in rural Bangladesh: an ethical preferences approach.
【24h】

Saving lives versus life-years in rural Bangladesh: an ethical preferences approach.

机译:挽救孟加拉国农村地区的生命与生存年:道德偏好的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using a random sample of individuals in rural Bangladesh, this paper investigates people's ethical preferences regarding relative values of lives when it comes to saving lives of individuals of different ages. By assuming that an individual has preferences concerning different states of the world, and that these preferences can be described by an individual social welfare function, the individuals' preferences for life-saving programs are elicited using a pair-wise choice experiment involving different life-saving programs. In the analyses, we calculate the social marginal rates of substitution between saved lives of people of different ages. We also test whether people have preferences for saving more life-years rather than only saving lives. In particular, we test and compare the two hypotheses that only lives matter and that only life-years matter. The results indicate that the value of a saved life decreases rapidly with age and that people have strong preferences for saving life-years rather than lives per se. Overall, the results clearly show the importance of the number of life-years saved in the valuation of life.
机译:本文使用孟加拉国农村地区的个体随机样本,研究了人们在挽救不同年龄个体的生命时相对于生命的相对价值的伦理偏好。通过假设一个人对世界的不同状态有偏好,并且这些偏好可以由一个人的社会福利功能来描述,则可以使用成对选择实验来得出该人对救生计划的偏好,该成对选择实验涉及不同的生活,保存程序。在分析中,我们计算了不同年龄人群的挽救生命之间的社会替代边际率。我们还测试了人们是否更愿意挽救更多的生命年而不是仅仅挽救生命。特别是,我们测试和比较了只有生命才重要和只有生命年才重要的两个假设。结果表明,挽救生命的价值随着年龄的增长而迅速下降,人们强烈倾向于挽救生命年而不是生命本身。总体而言,结果清楚地表明了在生命估值中节省的生命年数的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号