• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Health & place >The local food environment and diet: A systematic review
【24h】

The local food environment and diet: A systematic review

机译：当地的食物环境和饮食：系统回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Despite growing attention to the problem of obesogenic environments, there has not been a comprehensive review evaluating the food environment-diet relationship. This study aims to evaluate this relationship in the current literature, focusing specifically on the method of exposure assessment (GIS, survey, or store audit). This study also explores 5 dimensions of "food access" (availability, accessibility, affordability, accommodation, acceptability) using a conceptual definition proposed by Penchansky and Thomas (1981). Articles were retrieved through a systematic keyword search in Web of Science and supplemented by the reference lists of included studies. Thirty-eight studies were reviewed and categorized by the exposure assessment method and the conceptual dimensions of access it captured. GIS-based measures were the most common measures, but were less consistently associated with diet than other measures. Few studies examined dimensions of affordability, accommodation, and acceptability. Because GIS-based measures on their own may not capture important non-geographic dimensions of access, a set of recommendations for future researchers is outlined.
机译：尽管人们越来越关注致肥胖环境的问题，但尚未对食品环境与饮食的关系进行全面的评估。这项研究旨在评估当前文献中的这种关系，特别侧重于暴露评估方法（GIS，调查或商店审核）。这项研究还使用Penchansky和Thomas（1981）提出的概念性定义，探索了“食物获取”的5个维度（可获取性，可及性，可负担性，可住宿性，可接受性）。通过在Web of Science中进行系统的关键字搜索来检索文章，并通过纳入研究的参考列表进行补充。通过暴露评估方法及其捕获的访问量的概念范围，对38项研究进行了回顾和分类。基于GIS的措施是最常见的措施，但与饮食相比，与其他措施的关联性较差。很少有研究检查可承受性，适应性和可接受性的维度。由于基于GIS的措施本身可能无法捕获重要的非地理方面的访问权限，因此为未来的研究人员提出了一系列建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号