...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy >Smoking cessation should have more emphasis within Tobacco Control? The case for.
【24h】

Smoking cessation should have more emphasis within Tobacco Control? The case for.

机译：戒烟应该在烟草控制中得到更多的重视吗？的情况。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Smoking cessation is usually mentioned last in the chain of established measures to improve Tobacco Control. This seems logical, as smoking cessation is a secondary or tertiary preventative measure only. In the recently proposed Tobacco Control Scale (TCS) using 6 Tobacco Control measures pricing is considered most important, and smoking cessation least important. For current smokers secondary or tertiary preventative measures are necessary with smoking cessation being the most effective one as its impact on health is immediate. Pricing, on the other hand, is less effective in inciting current smokers to quit. Further, the vast majority of smokers would like to quit if they were able; so help in achieving this goal is welcome. Other Tobacco Control measures, on the other hand, are mostly negatively perceived by smokers because they perceive them as curtailment of their freedom. This is a psychological advantage the health professional active in this area has over other people involved in Tobacco Control and must be exploited. There is also strong evidence that smoking cessation is cost-effective, especially when comparing costs involved in addressing other important health risk factors, such as hyperlipidemia and arterial hypertension. Finally, the role of smoking cessation in helping to decrease social acceptability of smoking should not be underrated as every smoker who quits sets an example for other smokers to follow or for children not to start. In summary, smoking cessation continues to be of paramount importance among Tobacco Control measures, and should get more emphasis especially in health care settings.
机译：在改善烟草控制的既定措施链中，通常最后提到戒烟。这似乎合乎逻辑，因为戒烟只是第二或第三级的预防措施。在最近提出的使用6种烟草控制措施的烟草控制量表（TCS）中，定价被认为是最重要的，而戒烟则是最不重要的。对于当前的吸烟者，必须采取二级或三级预防措施，其中最有效的措施是戒烟，因为它对健康的影响是立竿见影的。另一方面，定价在煽动当前吸烟者戒烟方面效果较差。此外，绝大多数吸烟者愿意戒烟。因此，欢迎为实现该目标提供帮助。另一方面，其他控烟措施大多被吸烟者否定，因为他们认为这些措施是对他们自由的限制。这是活跃于该领域的卫生专业人员优于其他参与控烟的人员的心理优势，必须加以利用。也有强有力的证据表明，戒烟具有成本效益，特别是在比较解决其他重要健康风险因素（例如高脂血症和动脉高血压）所涉及的成本时。最后，不要低估戒烟在帮助降低社会对吸烟的接受度中的作用，因为每位戒烟者都为其他烟民效仿或不让孩子戒烟树立了榜样。总之，在控烟措施中，戒烟仍然是最重要的，尤其是在医疗机构中，戒烟应得到更多的重视。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号