...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Vaccine >Attitudes of homoeopathic physicians towards vaccination
【24h】

Attitudes of homoeopathic physicians towards vaccination

机译：同种疗法医生对疫苗接种的态度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Vaccinations are one of the most effective preventive procedures in modern medicine. However, earlier studies have indicated that homoeopathic physicians do not recommend or apply vaccinations as frequently as their allopathic colleagues. Few studies have been undertaken to clarify this question and most of these have not distinguished between medically and non-medically qualified homoeopathic practitioners. Therefore, misunderstandings have arisen concerning this question. In the study presented only medically qualified colleagues were included. In the course of this study, 219 medically qualified homoeopathic and 281 non-homoeopathic physicians in Germany (response rate 30.4%) returned a questionnaire about the application and recommendation of 17 different vaccinations in their practices. The answers show that the responding homoeopathic physicians do not generally refuse vaccines but rather view them with a specific hierarchy. The 'classical' vaccines against tetanus, diphtheria and poliomyelitis are applied to nearly the same degree as by non-homoeopathic colleagues. Vaccines against childhood diseases, risk group vaccinations and vaccinations judged as ineffective are applied and accepted with more restraint by homoeopathic physicians.
机译：疫苗接种是现代医学中最有效的预防措施之一。但是，较早的研究表明，同种疗法的医生不像同种疗法的同事那样推荐或接种疫苗。很少进行研究来澄清这个问题，并且大多数没有区分医学和非医学合格的顺势疗法从业者。因此，对该问题产生了误解。在提出的研究中，仅包括具有医学资格的同事。在研究过程中，德国的219位医学合格的顺势疗法医生和281位非顺势疗法医生（答复率为30.4％）返回了一份有关其实践中17种不同疫苗的应用和推荐的问卷。答案表明，有反应的同种内科医师通常不会拒绝疫苗，而是会按照特定的层次来查看疫苗。针对破伤风，白喉和脊髓灰质炎的“经典”疫苗的使用程度与非同种疗法的同事几乎相同。针对儿童疾病的疫苗，风险人群的疫苗和被判定为无效的疫苗均由同种疗法医生加以限制地使用和接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号