...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Recovery of hypoglycemia awareness in long-standing type 1 diabetes: A multicenter 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial comparing insulin pump with multiple daily injections and continuous with conventional glucose self-monitoring (HypoCOMPaSS)
【24h】

Recovery of hypoglycemia awareness in long-standing type 1 diabetes: A multicenter 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial comparing insulin pump with multiple daily injections and continuous with conventional glucose self-monitoring (HypoCOMPaSS)

机译:长期存在的1型糖尿病患者对低血糖意识的恢复:一项多中心2×2析因随机对照试验,比较了每天多次注射胰岛素泵和常规血糖自我监测(HypoCOMPaSS)连续进行的胰岛素泵

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) can be improved and severe hypoglycemia (SH) prevented in type 1 diabetes, we compared an insulin pump (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]) with multiple daily injections (MDIs) and adjuvant real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT) with conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 24-week 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial in adults with type 1 diabetes and IAH was conducted. All received comparable education, support, and congruent therapeutic targets aimed at rigorous avoidance of biochemical hypogly-cemia without relaxing overall control. Primary end point was between-intervention difference in 24-week hypoglycemia awareness (Gold score). RESULTS: A total of 96 participants (mean diabetes duration 29 years) were randomized. Overall, biochemical hypoglycemia (≤3.0 mmol/L) decreased (53 ± 63 to 24 ± 56 min/24 h; P = 0.004 [t test]) without deterioration in HbA1c. Hypoglycemia awareness improved (5.1 ± 1.1 to 4.1 ± 1.6; P = 0.0001 [t test]) with decreased SH (8.9 ± 13.4 to 0.8 ± 1.8 episodes/patient-year; P = 0.0001 [t test]). At 24 weeks, there was no significant difference in awareness comparing CSII with MDI (4.1 ± 1.6 vs. 4.2 ± 1.7; difference 0.1; 95% CI 20.6to 0.8) and RTwith SMBG (4.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.0 ± 1.7; difference 20.3; 95% CI 21.0 to 0.4). Between-group analyses demonstrated comparable reductions in SH, fear of hypoglycemia, and insulin doses with equivalent HbA1c. Treatment satisfaction was higher with CSII than MDI (32 ± 3 vs. 29 ± 6; P = 0.0003 [t test]), but comparable with SMBG and RT (30 ± 5 vs. 30 ± 5; P = 0.79 [t test]). CONCLUSIONS: Hypoglycemia awareness can be improved and recurrent SH prevented in longstanding type 1 diabetes without relaxing HbA1c. Similar biomedical outcomes can be attained with conventional MDI and SMBG regimens compared with CSII/RT, although satisfaction was higher with CSII.
机译:目的:为确定是否可以改善1型糖尿病患者对低血糖(IAH)的意识障碍和严重的低血糖(SH),我们将胰岛素泵(连续皮下注射胰岛素[CSII])与每日多次注射(MDI)和佐剂进行了比较实时连续血糖监测(RT)和常规的自我血糖监测(SMBG)。研究设计与方法:进行了一项针对1型糖尿病和IAH成年人的24周2×2析因随机对照试验。所有人均获得了可比的教育,支持和一致的治疗目标,目的是在不放松总体控制的情况下,严格避免生化低血糖症。主要终点为24周低血糖意识的干预之间差异(金评分)。结果:总共96名参与者(平均糖尿病持续时间29年)被随机分组​​。总体而言,生化性低血糖症(≤3.0mmol / L)减少了(53±63至24±56 min / 24 h; P = 0.004 [t测试]),而HbA1c并未恶化。低血糖意识得到改善(5.1±1.1至4.1±1.6; P = 0.0001 [t检验]),SH下降(8.9±13.4至0.8±1.8发作/患者年; P = 0.0001 [t检验])。在第24周时,与CSII与MDI相比(4.1±1.6 vs. 4.2±1.7;差异0.1; 95%CI 20.6至0.8)和RT与SMBG的认知(4.3±1.6 vs. 4.0±1.7;差异20.3)没有显着差异。 ; 95%CI 21.0到0.4)。组间分析表明,与等效的HbA1c相比,SH的降低,可疑的低血糖症和胰岛素剂量的降低均相当。 CSII的治疗满意度高于MDI(32±3 vs. 29±6; P = 0.0003 [t检验]),但与SMBG和RT相当(30±5 vs. 30±5; P = 0.79 [t检验])。 )。结论:在不放松HbA1c的情况下,可以改善长期1型糖尿病患者的低血糖意识,并防止其复发。与CSII / RT相比,常规MDI和SMBG方案可以达到相似的生物医学结果,尽管CSII的满意度更高。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号