• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Drug and alcohol review >Fact or fiction? A critique of the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey 2002.
【24h】

Fact or fiction? A critique of the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey 2002.

机译：事实还是虚构？对《 2002年全国土著和托雷斯海峡岛民社会调查》的评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The ability of policy makers, practitioners and the broader public to respond appropriately in reducing the harms caused by alcohol misuse depends in large part on our understanding of the nature of the problem. In the case of consumption patterns and associated harms among indigenous minority peoples--in Australia and elsewhere--such an understanding is often difficult to achieve. There are a host of reasons for this including cultural differences between indigenous peoples and the broader populations within which they are located, cultural heterogeneity among indigenous peoples themselves, political and economic disadvantages which exacerbate misuse and its effects, methodological difficulties in the appropriate design of data collection instruments, sampling issues and the issues in the interpretation of data. All these difficulties mean that we need to subject any studies of substance misuse among indigenous peoples to a high level of scrutiny. This is particularly the case when such studies are conducted by organisations that are generally regarded as 'authoritative' sources of information. Chikritzhs & Brady have done this in the case of the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey 2002, conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. In their review of this and other surveys, they demonstrate that to produce valid information about indigenous alcohol misuse, as well as having the skills to conduct broad population surveys, it is necessary to have an understanding of both methods of collecting data on alcohol consumption and Indigenous cultures themselves.
机译：决策者，从业人员和广大公众对减少滥用酒精造成的危害做出适当反应的能力在很大程度上取决于我们对问题性质的理解。就澳大利亚和其他地方的土著少数民族之间的消费模式和相关危害而言，这种理解通常难以实现。造成这种情况的原因有很多，其中包括土著人民与他们所居住的更广泛的人群之间的文化差异，土著人民自身之间的文化异质性，加剧滥用和影响的政治和经济劣势，适当数据设计中的方法困难收集工具，抽样问题和数据解释中的问题。所有这些困难意味着我们需要对土著人民中滥用药物的任何研究进行严格的审查。当此类研究由通常被视为“权威”信息源的组织进行时，尤其如此。 Chikritzhs＆Brady在澳大利亚统计局进行的2002年《全国原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社会调查》中做到了这一点。在对本次调查和其他调查的审查中，他们证明，要获得有关本地酒精滥用的有效信息，并具备进行广泛人群调查的技能，有必要了解两种收集酒精消费数据和方法的方法。土著文化本身。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号