...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation journal >Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity: a review of blood pressure interpretation 100 years after Korotkov.
【24h】

Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity: a review of blood pressure interpretation 100 years after Korotkov.

机译:脉搏波分析和脉搏波速度:Korotkov手术100年后的血压解释综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The pulsatile component of blood pressure (ie, pulse pressure) has received considerable attention as an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In particular, central blood pressure measurements in the ascending aorta or in the carotid artery are expected to be more useful than conventional brachial pressure measurements for predicting cardiovascular events because central pressure, not the brachial pressure, is the pressure that target organs encounter. Due to wave reflection, the blood pressure in the upper limb does not represent the central blood pressure; therefore, leading researchers have enthusiastically promoted a noninvasive method of measuring central blood pressure and the resulting aortic stiffness. Until now, there has been an increasing body of evidence to support the accuracy and superiority of central blood pressure measurements as well as the assessment of aortic properties over classical brachial pressure measurements. In this review, the information regarding these "central" indices derived from 2 main methods, namely "pulse wave analysis" and "pulse wave velocity", for the application of central blood pressure measurements and arterial stiffness to clinical study and practice, has been summarized.
机译:血压的脉动成分(即脉压)作为心血管疾病的重要危险因素已引起了广泛关注。特别地,由于中心压力而非肱动脉压力是靶器官遇到的压力,因此预期升主动脉或颈动脉中的中心血压比常规肱动脉压力测量更能预测心血管事件。由于波反射,上肢的血压不代表中心血压;因此,领先的研究人员积极地开发了一种无创方法来测量中心血压和由此产生的主动脉僵硬度。迄今为止,越来越多的证据支持中心血压测量的准确性和优越性以及对主动脉性能的评估优于传统的肱动脉血压测量。在这篇综述中,关于这些“中心”指标的信息来自两种主要方法,即“脉搏波分析”和“脉搏波速度”,用于将中央血压测量和动脉僵硬度应用于临床研究和实践。总结。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号