首页> 外文期刊>Journal - Canadian Dental Association >Laypersons' perceptions of the esthetics of visible anterior occlusion.
【24h】

Laypersons' perceptions of the esthetics of visible anterior occlusion.

机译:外行人对可见的前牙咬合美学的看法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To analyze 6 different types of visible anterior occlusion, exclusive of extraoral facial features, in terms of their esthetic appeal, as perceived by 91 randomly selected adult laypersons with different levels of education in Lima, Peru. METHODS: Photographic images of 3 examples of each occlusion type (open bite [OB], deep bite [DB], crossbite [CB], end-to-end bite [EE], crowded bite [CwB] and ideal bite [IB]) were prepared. Evaluators used a visual analogue scale (VAS) to rate their perceptions of the esthetic appeal of each view. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test differences in mean scores among occlusion types and to test the effect of evaluator characteristics on perceived attractiveness. RESULTS: The mean score was highest for IB, followed by EE, DB, CB, CwB and OB. Oneway ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test showed no difference between the highestscoring occlusion types (IB and EE, p > 0.99); each of the remaining groups was significantly different from both IB and EE (p < 0.001). The scores for DB, CB, CwB and OB were progressively lower, although not significantly different from one another (p > 0.05). Univariate ANOVA to determine the effects of evaluator characteristics (age, level of education, gender and interaction between level of education and gender) showed that gender was a significant factor (p < 0.034) for all bite groups except OB. Level of education was significant only for OB (p = 0.020) and age only for EE (p = 0.011). The interaction between level of education and gender was significant for all bite types (p < 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Lay evaluators identified ideal and EE bite occlusal relationships as esthetically most pleasing. They judged DB, CB, CwB and OB bite relationships as less esthetically pleasing but did not differentiate between these types of malocclusions.
机译:目的:从审美吸引力的角度分析6种不同类型的可见前路牙合,不包括口外面部特征。在秘鲁利马,有91位随机选择的受过不同教育程度的成年外行人认为它们具有美感。方法:每种咬合类型(开放咬[OB],深咬[DB],交叉咬[CB],端对端咬[EE],拥挤咬[CwB]和理想咬[IB])的3个示例的摄影图像)准备。评估人员使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)来评估他们对每种视图的审美吸引力的看法。方差分析(ANOVA)用于测试遮挡类型之间的平均得分差异,并测试评估者特征对感知吸引力的影响。结果:IB的平均分数最高,其次是EE,DB,CB,CwB和OB。单向方差分析与Bonferroni事后检验表明,得分最高的闭塞类型之间无差异(IB和EE,p> 0.99);其余各组与IB和EE均显着不同(p <0.001)。 DB,CB,CwB和OB的得分逐渐降低,尽管彼此之间无显着差异(p> 0.05)。用单因素方差分析确定评估者特征(年龄,教育水平,性别以及教育水平和性别之间的相互作用)的影响表明,性别是除OB以外所有咬人组的重要因素(p <0.034)。教育水平仅对OB有意义(p = 0.020),而对EE则仅年龄(p = 0.011)。在所有叮咬类型中,教育水平和性别之间的相互作用均很显着(p <0.046)。结论:评估员认为理想和EE咬合关系在美学上是最令人满意的。他们认为DB,CB,CwB和OB咬合关系在美学上不太令人满意,但没有区分这些类型的错牙合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号