• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >The Good and Bad of Being Fair: Effects of Procedural and Interpersonal Justice Behaviors on Regulatory Resources
【24h】

The Good and Bad of Being Fair: Effects of Procedural and Interpersonal Justice Behaviors on Regulatory Resources

机译：公平的利与弊：程序和人际公正行为对监管资源的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The justice, literature has paid considerable attention to the beneficial effects of fair behaviors for recipients of such behaviors. It is possible, however, that exhibiting fair behaviors may come at a cost for actors. In this article, we integrate ego depletion theory with organizational justice research in order to examine the consequences of justice behaviors for actors. We used an experience-sampling method in a sample of managerial employees to examine the relations of performing procedural justice and interpersonal justice behaviors with subsequent changes in actors' regulatory resources. Our results indicate that procedural justice behaviors are draining, whereas interpersonal justice behaviors are replenishing for actors. Depletion, in turn, adversely affected the performance of citizenship behavior, and depletion mediated relations of justice behavior with citizenship. Furthermore, 2 traits that impact self-regulatdry skills-extraversion and neuroticism-moderated the replenishing effects of engaging in interpersonal justice behaviors. We conclude by discussing implications and avenues for future research.
机译：正义文献对公平行为对这种行为的接受者的有益影响给予了极大的关注。但是，表现出公平的行为可能会给演员带来代价。在本文中，我们将自我耗竭理论与组织正义研究相结合，以检验正义行为对行为者的后果。我们在管理人员的样本中使用了一种经验抽样方法，以检查执行程序正义和人际正义行为与行为者监管资源的后续变化之间的关系。我们的结果表明，程序正义行为正在流失，而人际正义行为正在为行为者提供补充。耗竭反过来对公民行为的表现产生不利影响，而耗费介导的正义行为与公民行为之间的关系。此外，影响自我调节技能的两个特征-外向性和神经质-调节了参与人际正义行为的补充作用。最后，我们讨论了未来研究的意义和途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号