...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >Absence of Malice: A Meta-Analysis of Nonresponse Bias in Counterproductive Work Behavior Research
【24h】

Absence of Malice: A Meta-Analysis of Nonresponse Bias in Counterproductive Work Behavior Research

机译：恶意软件的缺失：对适得其反的工作行为研究中无应答偏见的Meta分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Despite the alleged frequency of counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in the population, most samples exhibit exceedingly low base rates. One potential explanation for this incongruence is nonre-sponse bias, which leads to range restriction in the CWB distribution. We investigated this possibility by determining whether response rates within CWB research were lower than that found across management research and whether range restriction could explain reduced CWB engagement. We also examined whether range restriction attenuated CWB's relations to other variables. Our primary findings are that reported response rates for studies containing CWB measures are substantially lower (37%) than response rates reported within the general management literature (53%) and that range restriction is likely present in the CWB literature, resulting in low base rates and attenuated relations to CWB. In addition, tests of publication bias indicated that low response rates are less likely to be reported, and the true response rate within the CWB literature may be considerably lower.
机译：尽管据称在人群中出现适得其反的工作行为（CWB），但大多数样本的基准率都非常低。这种不一致的一个可能的解释是非响应偏差，这导致CWB分布范围受限。我们通过确定CWB研究中的回应率是否低于管理研究中的回应率以及范围限制是否可以解释CWB参与减少来调查这种可能性。我们还检查了距离限制是否削弱了CWB与其他变量的关系。我们的主要发现是，包含CWB措施的研究报告的响应率（37％）比一般管理文献中的报告率（53％）低得多，并且CWB文献中可能存在范围限制，导致较低的基本率与CWB的关系减弱。此外，发布偏倚的测试表明，不太可能报告低响应率，而CWB文献中的真实响应率可能要低得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号