...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >Are We Really Measuring What We Say We’re Measuring? Using Video Techniques to Supplement Traditional Construct Validation Procedures
【24h】

Are We Really Measuring What We Say We’re Measuring? Using Video Techniques to Supplement Traditional Construct Validation Procedures

机译:我们真的在衡量我们在说什么吗?使用视频技术补充传统的构造验证程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several researchers have persuasively argued that the most important evidence to consider when assessing construct validity is whether variations in the construct of interest cause corresponding variations in the measures of the focal construct. Unfortunately, the literature provides little practical guidance on how researchers can go about testing this. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to describe how researchers can use video techniques to test whether their scales measure what they purport to measure. First, we discuss how researchers can develop valid manipulations of the focal construct that they hope to measure. Next, we explain how to design a study to use this manipulation to test the validity of the scale. Finally, comparing and contrasting traditional and contemporary perspectives on validation, we discuss the advantages and limitations of video-based validation procedures.
机译:几位研究人员有说服力地指出,评估构架效度时要考虑的最重要证据是,所关注构架的变异是否会引起焦点构架测量值的相应变异。不幸的是,文献几乎没有提供有关研究人员如何进行测试的实践指导。因此,本文的目的是描述研究人员如何使用视频技术来测试他们的体重秤是否能够测量他们声称的测量目标。首先,我们讨论研究人员如何开发对他们希望测量的焦点结构的有效操纵。接下来,我们解释如何设计研究以使用此操作来测试量表的有效性。最后,通过比较和对比传统和现代的验证观点,我们讨论了基于视频的验证程序的优点和局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号