首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical densitometry >Comparisons of body-composition prediction accuracy: a study of 2 bioelectric impedance consumer devices in healthy Chinese persons using DXA and MRI as criteria methods.
【24h】

Comparisons of body-composition prediction accuracy: a study of 2 bioelectric impedance consumer devices in healthy Chinese persons using DXA and MRI as criteria methods.

机译:人体成分预测准确性的比较:以DXA和MRI为标准方法对健康中国人的2种生物电阻抗消费设备进行的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compared the accuracy of body-composition estimation for 2 commercial single-frequency bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) devices in 200 healthy Chinese adults using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as criterion methods. We evaluated the fat mass percentage (%FM), skeletal muscle mass percentage (%SM), or total-body bone-free lean mass percentage (%TBBLM), and level of visceral fat mass (VF(level)) using the Omron HBF-359 (SF-BIA8) and Tanita BC-532 (SF-BIA4) BIA devices, MRI, and DXA. Both devices showed a similarly high correlation with DXA for %FM prediction (r=0.89 for SF-BIA8 and 0.90 for SF-BIA4) and with MRI and DXA for %SM and %TBBLM prediction (r=0.85 for SF-BIA8 and 0.89 for SF-BIA4). There were small but significant biases in all body-composition parameter evaluations except for %SM assessed by the SF-BIA8. Both the SF-BIA8 and SF-BIA4 provided small, insignificant mean biases but wide limits of agreement with MRI for VF(level) assessments. Both BIA devices can relatively accurately predict %FM and %SM in healthy Chinese adults. The SF-BIA8 is suitable for individual prediction of %SM, whereas the SF-BIA8 is required to eliminate systematic errors in this population by improving population-specific prediction equations from height, weight, and age to increase estimation accuracy.
机译:我们使用磁共振成像(MRI)和双能X射线吸收法(DXA)作为标准方法,比较了200名健康中国成年人中2种商用单频生物电阻抗分析(BIA)设备的身体成分估计的准确性。我们使用欧姆龙评估了脂肪质量百分比(%FM),骨骼肌质量百分比(%SM)或全身无骨瘦肉质量百分比(%TBBLM)以及内脏脂肪质量水平(VF(level)) HBF-359(SF-BIA8)和Tanita BC-532(SF-BIA4)BIA设备,MRI和DXA。两种设备都显示出与DXA的%FM预测(SF-BIA8的r = 0.89和SF-BIA4的0.90)以及与MRI和DXA的%SM和%TBBLM预测具有相似的高度相关性(SF-BIA8的r = 0.85和0.89) SF-BIA4)。除了由SF-BIA8评估的%SM以外,所有身体成分参数评估均存在微小但明显的偏差。 SF-BIA8和SF-BIA4均提供了较小的,微不足道的平均偏差,但与MRI进行VF(水平)评估的协议范围较宽。两种BIA设备都可以相对准确地预测健康中国成年人的%FM和%SM。 SF-BIA8适用于%SM的单独预测,而SF-BIA8需要通过改善身高,体重和年龄的特定人群预测方程式来消除该人群中的系统误差,以提高估计准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号