...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning >A Question of Authenticity: Status Quo Bias and the International Energy Agency's World Energy Outlook
【24h】

A Question of Authenticity: Status Quo Bias and the International Energy Agency's World Energy Outlook

机译:真实性问题:现状偏差和国际能源署的《世界能源展望》

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Over the past decade, transition scholars have argued that images of the future (of what sort of change is possible or probable, desirable or undesirable) play a critical role in societal transitions, and there is a long-standing tradition of analysis that points out the political significance of visions of the future. This article explores the politics of the future in sustainability transitions by looking at controversy surrounding a prominent global energy future reportthe International Energy Agency's World Energy Outlookbetween 1998 and 2008/2009. A key theme of this controversy was that the Outlook's record on global oil supply projections demonstrated a bias towards the preservation of the status quo. Based on research interviews conducted with key participants in this controversy, and a review of Outlooks produced between 1998 and 2008, we explore the main sites of contention' in the allegation of bias from both an internal' (sympathetic) and an external' (critical) perspective. We argue that the politics of bias have less to do with one's relationship vis-a-vis the preservation of the regime, and more to do with a question concerning the speaker's authenticity.
机译:在过去的十年中,转型学者认为,未来的图像(什么样的变化是可能的,可能的,可取的或不可取的)在社会转型中起着至关重要的作用,并且分析的长期传统指出未来愿景的政治意义。本文通过探讨围绕着著名的全球能源未来报告《国际能源署1998年至2008/2009年的世界能源展望》的争议来探讨可持续发展转型中的未来政治。这场争论的一个关键主题是,《展望》关于全球石油供应预测的记录表明,人们倾向于保持现状。基于对这一争议的主要参与者进行的研究访谈,以及对1998年至2008年发表的《展望》的回顾,我们探讨了“内部”(同情)和外部“(批判)偏见的争论的主要争论点”。 )的观点。我们认为,偏见政治与一个人相对于政权保存的关系很少,而更多地与说话人的真实性有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号