Guidelines for Initiating a Research Agenda: Topic Selection and Evidence of Impact

MARIA E. DELOST; TERESA S. NADDER

首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Laboratory Science: Journal of the American Society for Medical Technology >Guidelines for Initiating a Research Agenda: Topic Selection and Evidence of Impact

【24h】

Guidelines for Initiating a Research Agenda: Topic Selection and Evidence of Impact

机译：启动研究议程的准则：主题选择和影响证据

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The focus on scholarly productivity as an outcome measure for performance evaluations of personnel and/or units and benchmarking, purposes is increasing in both the academic and clinical settings. This article presents avenues for identifying achievable research projects in both the academic and clinical settings. Factors for consideration when selecting a project include its significance or impact on the profession, feasibility for implementing the project, and ethical issues related to human subjects protection. A review of the literature is essential for identifying gaps in knowledge and for constructing the hypothesis or research question.

机译：学术生产力作为对人员和/或单位的绩效评估和基准测试的结果度量，其目的在学术和临床环境中都在增加。本文介绍了在学术和临床环境中确定可实现的研究项目的途径。选择项目时要考虑的因素包括其对专业的重要性或影响，实施该项目的可行性以及与保护人类受试者有关的道德问题。文献综述对于识别知识差距以及构建假设或研究问题至关重要。

著录项

来源
《Clinical Laboratory Science: Journal of the American Society for Medical Technology》 |2014年第4期|共6页
作者
MARIA E. DELOST; TERESA S. NADDER;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类诊断学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Guidelines for Initiating a Research Agenda: Topic Selection and Evidence of Impact [J] . MARIA E. DELOST, TERESA S. NADDER Clinical Laboratory Science: Journal of the American Society for Medical Technology . 2014,第4期

机译：启动研究议程的准则：主题选择和影响证据
2. Clinical Practice Guidelines: AAO-HNSF Process for CPG Development and Topic Selection [J] . Choi Sukgi, Nnacheta Lorraine Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery: official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery . 2018,第2期

机译：临床实践指南：AAO-HNSF用于CPG开发和主题选择的过程
3. Consumer involvement in topic and outcome selection in the development of clinical practice guidelines [J] . TongA., Lopez-VargasP., HowellM., Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy . 2012,第4期

机译：消费者参与临床实践指南制定中的主题和结果选择
4. A Topic-centric Approach to Detecting New Evidences for Evidence-based Medical Guidelines [C] . Qing Hu, Zhisheng Huang, Annette ten Teije, International Conference on Health Informatics . 2016

机译：一种以主题为主题的方法，可以检测基于证据的医疗指南的新证据
5. Evidence of self-selection in banking and the impact on bank performance. [D] . Griswold, Melissa Colleen. 1996

机译：银行自我选择的证据及其对银行绩效的影响。
6. Review of evidence based clinical practice guidelines developed in Latin America and Caribbean during the last decade: an analysis of the methods for grading quality of evidence and topic prioritization [O] . Paula Andrea Cabrera, Rodrigo Pardo 2019

机译：回顾过去十年在拉丁美洲和加勒比地区制定的基于证据的临床实践指南：对证据质量分级和主题优先级排序的方法的分析
7. Guidelines for Initiating a Research Agenda: Research Design and Dissemination of Results [O] . Maria E. Delost, Teresa S. Nadder 2014

机译：启动研究议程指南：研究设计和传播结果
8. Guidelines for the Selection of Snow and Ice Control Materials to Mitigate Environmental Impacts [R] . 2007

机译：选择用于减轻环境影响的冰雪控制材料的指南

Guidelines for Initiating a Research Agenda: Topic Selection and Evidence of Impact

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅