...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of forensic sciences. >Author's response: My response to Dr. Dawes et al.'s letter follows (owing to the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory's approval process required of authors, the response could not be submitted to the Journal of Forensic Sciences in a timely manner.
【24h】

Author's response: My response to Dr. Dawes et al.'s letter follows (owing to the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory's approval process required of authors, the response could not be submitted to the Journal of Forensic Sciences in a timely manner.

机译:作者的回应:我对Dawes等人的信的回应如下(由于美国空军研究实验室需要作者的批准程序,因此该回应无法及时提交至《法医学杂志》。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Horvath-Palmatier laboratory study (JFS 2008:53^) concluded that the accuracy of the Exclusive Control Question and Non-Exclusive Control Question in the identification of guilty examinees was not statistically significant (80% and 85%, respectively). However, the difference in accuracy between Exclusive and Non-Exclusive Control Questions in the identification of innocent examinees was statistically significant (45% and 91%, respectively). A critical analysis of the Horvath-Palmatier study reveals a serious lack of understanding regarding the psychological structure and theoretical concept of the Backster Zone Comparison Technique (ZCT). This is reflected by the test structure and question format of the Zone Comparison Test used in the Horvath-Palmatier study and their failure to employ Backster's "Either-Or" rule that comprises the nucleus of the Backster ZCT for which the Exclusive Control Question was designed to enable. Recent published research (1) revealed that the Backster ZCT's overall accuracy was significantly reduced when its "Either-Or" rule was excluded.
机译:Horvath-Palmatier实验室研究(JFS 2008:53 ^)得出结论,排他性控制问题和非排他性控制问题在识别有罪考生的准确性上没有统计学意义(分别为80%和85%)。但是,排他性和非排他性对照问题在识别无辜应试者方面的准确性差异在统计学上具有显着意义(分别为45%和91%)。对Horvath-Palmatier研究的批判性分析表明,对于Backster Zone比较技术(ZCT)的心理结构和理论概念严重缺乏了解。这反映在Horvath-Palmatier研究中使用的区域比较测试的测试结构和问题格式,以及他们未能采用Backster的“ Either-Or”规则(该规则包含Backster ZCT的核)而设计了排他性控制问题启用。最近发表的研究(1)显示,如果不考虑Backster ZCT的“无论是”还是“不”规则,则其总体准确性会大大降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号