...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of glaucoma >Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements With the Reichert Pt100, the Keeler Pulsair Intellipuff Portable Noncontact Tonometers, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
【24h】

Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements With the Reichert Pt100, the Keeler Pulsair Intellipuff Portable Noncontact Tonometers, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

机译：与Reichert Pt100，Keeler Pulsair Intellipuff便携式非接触眼压计和Goldmann压平眼压计进行眼压测量的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose:The aim of this study was to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using 2 portable tonometers, the Keeler Pulsair Intellipuff and the Reichert PT100, with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT).Materials and Methods:Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on normotensive and hypertensive patients recruited from the outpatient clinic of the University Hospital of Grenoble. IOP was measured using 2 portable noncontact tonometers (NCTs) and GAT in one eye of each patient in a random order. Central corneal thickness was measured with the Accutome PachPen Pachymeter. The Wilcoxon and t tests were used to compare the differences between tonometers, the Pearson and the Spearman correlation tests to evaluate the correlation among the methods, and the Bland-Altman plots to evaluate the agreement among the methods. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the agreement among the methods in normotensive and hypertensive patients separately.Results:A total of 137 eyes of 137 patients were included, 104 normotensive and 33 hypertensive eyes. We found an excellent agreement between PT100 and GAT (ICC=0.77) and between Intellipuff and GAT (ICC=0.75) in normotensive patients. We found a fair to good agreement (ICC=0.67) between PT100 and GAT in hypertensive patients. The agreement we found between Intellipuff and GAT was also excellent in hypertensive patients (ICC=0.86). Both NCTs significantly overestimated IOP measurements compared with GAT in normotensive and hypertensive eyes (mean of the differences between PT100 and GAT: 1.32.1 and 8.1 +/- 4.6 mm Hg in normotensive and in hypertensive patients, respectively (P<0.05), and between Pulsair Intellipuff and GAT: 1.5 +/- 1.8 and 2.3 +/- 4.8 mm Hg in normotensive and in hypertensive patients, respectively (P<0.05).Conclusions:The 2 NCTs agree well with GAT in normotensive patients. The Pulsair Intellipuff also agrees well with GAT in hypertensive patients.
机译：目的：本研究的目的是比较使用2台便携式眼压计（Keeler Pulsair Intellipuff和Reichert PT100）与高曼压平眼压计（GAT）进行的眼内压（IOP）测量。材料和方法：从格勒诺布尔大学医院的门诊招募的血压正常和高血压患者。使用2台便携式非接触眼压计（NCT）和GAT以随机顺序在每位患者的一只眼睛中测量IOP。中央角膜厚度用Accutome PachPen测厚仪测量。使用Wilcoxon和t检验比较眼压计之间的差异，使用Pearson和Spearman相关检验评估方法之间的相关性，使用Bland-Altman图评估方法之间的一致性。采用类内相关系数（ICC）分别评估血压正常和高血压患者方法之间的一致性。结果：纳入137例患者中的137眼，血压正常的104眼和高血压的33眼。我们在血压正常的患者中发现PT100和GAT（ICC = 0.77）之间以及Intellipuff和GAT（ICC = 0.75）之间有很好的一致性。我们在高血压患者中发现PT100和GAT之间存在公平到良好的一致性（ICC = 0.67）。我们发现Intellipuff和GAT之间的协议在高血压患者中也很出色（ICC = 0.86）。在血压正常和高血压的眼睛中，两个NCT均比GAT明显高估了IOP测量值（血压正常和高血压患者PT100和GAT之间的差异分别为1.32.1和8.1 +/- 4.6 mm Hg（P <0.05），以及Pulsair Intellipuff和GAT之间：血压正常和高血压患者分别为1.5 +/- 1.8和2.3 +/- 4.8 mm Hg（P <0.05）。在高血压患者中与GAT非常吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号