首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hand therapy: Official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists >Measurement of maximum voluntary pinch strength:: Effects of forearm position and outcome score.
【24h】

Measurement of maximum voluntary pinch strength:: Effects of forearm position and outcome score.

机译:最大自愿捏力强度的测量::前臂位置和结局评分的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of forearm position and outcome score on key, fingertip, and three-jaw chuck pinch strength. Maximum voluntary key, fingertip, and three-jaw chuck pinches were performed by 135 healthy adults (20-88 years old) three times in a pronated, supinated, and neutral forearm position with the right and left hand using a B&L (B&L Engineering, Tustin, CA) pinch gauge. The highest, first, and mean scores of three pinch forces were recorded. Three 3x3 factorial repeated-measures analyses tested each type of pinch strength. Forearm position affected key and fingertip pinches (p<0.017; effect sizes <0.14) but not three-jaw chuck pinch. The highest score ranked highest followed by the first and then the mean of the three scores (p<0.017; effect sizes >0.53). Although the effects of type of outcome score were consistent, the statistically significant effects of forearm position and outcome score may be too small (<1 lb) to be clinically relevant. Standardized positioning during pinch strength measurement is still recommended despite these findings.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定前臂位置和结局评分对按键,指尖和三爪夹头捏力的影响。 135名健康成年人(20-88岁)使用B&L在左右手的前旋,俯卧和中立位置上进行了3次最大自愿键,指尖和三爪卡盘捏(B&L Engineering,塔斯汀(加利福尼亚州)。记录了三个捏力的最高,第一和平均得分。三个3x3阶乘重复测量分析测试了每种类型的挤压强度。前臂位置会影响键和指尖的挤压(p <0.017;效果大小<0.14),但不适用于三爪夹头挤压。最高分数排名最高,其次是三个分数的平均值,然后是平均值(p <0.017;效应量> 0.53)。尽管结局评分类型的影响是一致的,但前臂位置和结局评分在统计学上的显着影响可能太小(<1 lb)而与临床无关。尽管有这些发现,仍建议在挤压强度测量过程中进行标准化定位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号